Pull up any of those 2016 threads on the topic of "The Wall" and you will find the Trump supporters defending heavily the side of the argument that a real honest to goodness wall could be built and that Trump is not wrong saying it at his campaign stops. Those of us supporting another candidate argued that it is not possible to build a wall on the entire border and it would be smarter if he would be honest and define the wall as improving what we have, which is walls and fences, and surveillance where those areas not possible or affordable to put a physical barrier. Who was right, now?