As I understand it the signing of her yearbook wasn't fake. Moore apparently commonly signed his first name without the last. She added the last name, the place and the date. She should have said so from the beginning but that doesn't negate that he signed her yearbook. Obviously it isn't a crime to sign a yearbook. But he said he didn't know her at all and his signing of her yearbook negates that claim.
He might not have known her. I doubt Spiro Agnew, Glenn Seaborg, or Cab Calloway could pick me out of a crowd, either, yet I had all their autographs at one time--and many more.
We do not know where or under what circumstances the yearbook was signed, but I will bet it was not at the restaurant. The part that was "added in": altered, 'enhanced' AKA
forged was the part which put it at the restaurant, and that was the whole basis of her claims against him. They also got it wrong in that Moore did not frequent the place. Then someone else piped up and said she never worked there. Other details were simply wrong. The dumpsters were on the side, never in the back, for instance.
The forgery was to put him in a place and at a time where and when it was alleged he did something. That's known most mildly as tampering with evidence. If any DA anywhere did that, it'd be thrown out of court--yet Gloria Allred (the prosecutor in the court of public opinion) stood up there with that woman and presented this crap as gospel. The Press did all they could to deny the presentation of exculpatory material.
And simply enough, because the media favor abortion, proclaim, to their personal benefit, additional 'rights' for homosexuals, and generally support the liberal agenda to the last jot and tittle, they had skin in the game and as much reason to hate Roy Moore as they had to support Jones.
Well, folks, those of you who bought into the media line got the candidate behind door no 2, the liberal spin machine got its victory, and you helped.
Now go look hard at Jones and tell me you all did right.
