@Bigun
To prove that you're slobbering over a false headline?
@CatherineofAragon Sore/Loserman is about all I can think of when I see your posts.
The headline was sensational, but it said inside the article what was needed to clear it up. Even what you quote from Bigun proves it.
....finally admitted that she forged a portion....
This is the truth... you can try to argue that she only added stuff, but since in her televised press conference she quoted the whole thing as being wrote by Moore then that is not true.
The headline is an abbreviated review of the article... everyone that is anyone in news/politics like we are know to read beyond headlines for the nitty gritty. Breitbart did elaborate in it's full article that she claims she only changed a portion of yearbook quote. We don't know of course if that is true, she still has not released the book to be examined and probable will not (why, because even more may of been fabricated .. or not, we don't know)... All we know is she claimed ALL of the inscription was from Moore at one time and now has changed her story. She lied in claiming all of it thus in reality the headline was not an untruth.
Splinting hairs to save face is about all I see you doing. Another example is when you say mostly Trump supporters are defending Moore. Well I didn't vote Trump, I still don't like Trump for the most part, and I am defending Moore. I don't see Moore as being a Trump clone whatsoever. As a matter of fact I don't remember Moore (his wife is his voice on FB) supporting Trump during the election. As a matter of fact, Trump sorta spit in Moore's face when he suggested Pryor was a SCOTUS candidate. Pryor was the one that grilled Moore in one of his trials about being a Christian. Lets just say, I doubt Moore has the love of Trump as some think. Moore is using Trump, just as Trump is using Moore. They are putting up a front, but a wise political bug like you and me person sees it for what it really is. They at best tolerate each other when it is wise to do so.
You can bet there will be clashes between the two. Moore like Cruz being a constitutionalist (and Christian) will clash with the Rino agendas in Washington. I can understand why they don't want Moore, but don't want to alienate Alabama at the same time. It is an ugly dance to watch.
There was more I want to say, but my carpel tunnel is acting up pretty bad. Hurts to type.