Police Murdered This Unarmed Man — But Media Is Completely Silent Because He Was White

[240B]

WARNING: SERIOUSLY: THIS IS STRONG SERIOUS WARNING

What you will see in this video is an innocent man being tortured and then murdered by a Phoenix police officer. It is the real deal. It will mess you up. Those who can stomach it should watch it. But for the faint of heart. Do not click the link.


American News Hub
By Andrew Mark Miller
December 8, 2017


Blue lives matter. Every rational person understands that supporting the police is critical and that the vast majority of officers are good people doing the right thing. With that being said, it’s pretty interesting that the national media is largely ignoring what just went down in Arizona.


(more)
https://facts.americanewshub.com/2017/12/08/police-murdered-unarmed-man-media-completely-silent-white/

[INVAR]

I cannot bring myself to watch the video.

We've been on the receiving end of corrupt cops on a power-trip, and the bad audio recording of the cops beating the crap out of my girls in their own home was enough to bring me to tears of rage.

They nearly succeeded in destroying the life of my youngest daughter, who was only 20 years old at the time, for refusing to let them into their home without a warrant over a bogus police report from a pissed-off neighbor.

So, I have no sympathy for law enforcement or our corrupt judicial system.  I had all my notions of what I assumed 'justice' in this country was shown to my face as nothing but a fairy tale.

This murder does not surprise me, nor the acquittal given what we have turned into as a country and how 'justice' in this country really works.

I'll just say - you are automatically guilty of whatever it is cops charge you with - and YOU must prove your own innocence, even when cops are caught lying red-handed on the stand.

[edpc]

The story fails to mention the police were there because someone reported guns being pointed out their hotel window.  As it was later discovered, there were two pellet guns found in the room.  That's kind of an important detail.  People reporting the initial call had no way of knowing they were pellet guns and neither did police.

[driftdiver]

There's no torture.  Just a poorly trained officer who was letting his fear control him who gave very confusing instruction to a drink guy.   The result is he shot the guy for no reason with his ar15.

[240B]

The torture was the dog-and-pony show he put the guy through. All he had to do was to walk over and cuff him. There was no need for any of the rest of it.


Also, there were other officers present. He could have covered and then had another office walk over and cuff the guy.


The impression I got was that the officer was looking for any reason at all to shoot the guy no matter how small. He knew he was going to shoot him from the first moment he encountered him. He was just looking for a reason.

[bolobaby]

1) The officer we acquitted. Therefore, the headline is completely false. Police did not "murder" this man. A jury of his peers acquitted him of murder. Therefore, the headline should read "Police Shot This..."

2) Many details are not included in the story, including the parts about the pellet guns, which - for all the police knew - were real guns at that time.

3) Why did the police have the suspects crawl forward? Seriously? How is this NOT obvious? The suspects just walked out of the room. The police ask SEVERAL times who else is in the room. They clearly do not believe that the room is empty. The unedited video continues with them checking out the room to determine if it is, in fact, empty. So, OBVIOUSLY, the police did not wish to move forward towards the open door where they had NO idea what lurked inside. They wanted the suspects to move away so they could be detained, THEN check out the room.

4) All that being said, I'm rather sick of this manner of policing. This is ultimately not acceptable. Police are lacking good judgment. And, for the record, if that happened with a soldier and an unarmed Afghani, the soldier would be court-martialed and dishonorably discharged. MAKE NO MISTAKE. How is it that we hold our war fighters to a higher standard than our civilian police force?

Enough is enough.

[edpc]

1) The officer we acquitted. Therefore, the headline is completely false. Police did not "murder" this man. A jury of his peers acquitted him of murder. Therefore, the headline should read "Police Shot This..."

4) All that being said, I'm rather sick of this manner of policing. This is ultimately not acceptable. Police are lacking good judgment. And, for the record, if that happened with a soldier and an unarmed Afghani, the soldier would be court-martialed and dishonorably discharged. MAKE NO MISTAKE. How is it that we hold our war fighters to a higher standard than our civilian police force?

As to the first, that's like saying Zarate didn't murder Steinle.  We know better.

In the last instance, a Marine shot an unarmed man pretending to be dead in 2004.  He wasn't charged.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/no-charges-in-fallujah-shooting/

[240B]

1) The officer we acquitted. Therefore, the headline is completely false. Police did not "murder" this man. A jury of his peers acquitted him of murder. Therefore, the headline should read "Police Shot This..."

2) Many details are not included in the story, including the parts about the pellet guns, which - for all the police knew - were real guns at that time.

3) Why did the police have the suspects crawl forward? Seriously? How is this NOT obvious? The suspects just walked out of the room. The police ask SEVERAL times who else is in the room. They clearly do not believe that the room is empty. The unedited video continues with them checking out the room to determine if it is, in fact, empty. So, OBVIOUSLY, the police did not wish to move forward towards the open door where they had NO idea what lurked inside. They wanted the suspects to move away so they could be detained, THEN check out the room.

4) All that being said, I'm rather sick of this manner of policing. This is ultimately not acceptable. Police are lacking good judgment. And, for the record, if that happened with a soldier and an unarmed Afghani, the soldier would be court-martialed and dishonorably discharged. MAKE NO MISTAKE. How is it that we hold our war fighters to a higher standard than our civilian police force?

Enough is enough.

OJ was found not guilty but that doesn't mean he didn't murder those people.


As far as other details left out of the story, the only details I need are seeing that guy laying on his belly crying and yelling 'please don't shoot me!' over and over. He knew that he was going to get shot. And the cop knew that he was going to shoot him. It was 'in the air', as they say.


Obey my orders! "I'm trying, I'm trying"...


This was straight up murder. The uber-macho cop wanted a shooting in his record. So he made one happen. And nothing was going to stop him.