Author Topic: Masterpiece Cakeshop Case May Hinge on a Claim against Disparate Treatment Read more at: http://www  (Read 479 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Masterpiece Cakeshop Case May Hinge on a Claim against Disparate Treatment
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454359/masterpiece-cakeshop-scotus-jack-phillips
December 5, 2017

The Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider the case of Jack Phillips, a Christian baker in Colorado who declined to create a wedding cake for a gay couple because of his deeply held religious beliefs. The case implicates the conflicting promises of law — while Phillips is guaranteed free speech and religious exercise, the couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, are also guaranteed fair and equitable treatment in places of public accommodation.

A third issue lurks beneath this Gordian knot. This Tuesday, Colorado must prove that it has generally and neutrally applied its anti-discrimination law, called the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA). Phillips and his amici argue that the record is replete with evidence of a double standard.

Two cases are of special relevance to approaching the matter of general and neutral applicability: Employment Division v. Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah. What Smith teaches is that a comprehensive prohibition connected to a compelling government interest is both neutral and generally applicable.

Lukumi holds that a law targeting a particular religion for disparate treatment, even if that law applies with equal force to all people, is neither neutral nor generally applicable. One could think of Smith and Lukumi as occupying opposite ends of the same spectrum. Phillips’s case could turn in significant part on where the justices place this controversy on the Smith–Lukumi axis. Phillips argues that his case is closer to Lukumi, given the conduct of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission in enforcing CADA. Whereas Phillips was subjected to a range of penalties for refusing to produce a cake for a gay wedding, commissioners reached different conclusions when roles were reversed.

In recent years, the commission permitted three separate bakers to rebuff Christian patrons requesting cakes promoting a traditional view of marriage. One such case, which mirrors Masterpiece in essential particulars, arose in March 2014, when a Christian fundamentalist named William Jack entered Azucar Bakery in Denver, hoping to procure two custom cakes. He asked that each cake take the shape of a Bible and feature scriptural passages condemning homosexuality and promoting the redemptive power of Christ....
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,081
  • Gender: Female
One of the commissioners called Phillips a "Nazi" and no better than a "slave holder".  I'd hardly call that impartial.   :whistle:

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Quote
...He identifies several telling disparities. First, there is incongruity at the general level: The court found that Azucar can, in conscience, refuse to denounce same-sex marriage through its work product while Phillips cannot, in conscience, refuse to sell products promoting same-sex marriage.

But then there are more-subtle disparities: For example, the court considered Azucar’s previous work for Christian patrons exonerating evidence, while finding Phillips’s willingness to sell other cakes and baked goods to gay couples immaterial. The court also reasoned that the views expressed on Jack’s cakes could reasonably be attributed to Azucar, but it found that Phillips had no speech interest in his custom goods.

It appears, he says, that the state has created two classes of bakers, and chosen to disfavor one on the basis of their viewpoint, even where underlying facts are identical. ...
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,889
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
I'm glad someone is finally addressing that this whole 'equal treatment' is BS. Some groups get protection, some don't. The baker shouldn't have to live up to a standard no one else does.
The Republic is lost.

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,366
  • Gender: Male
I'm glad someone is finally addressing that this whole 'equal treatment' is BS. Some groups get protection, some don't. The baker shouldn't have to live up to a standard no one else does.

By utter coincidence, the groups that get preferential treatment just happen to be constituencies of the Democrat Party. /s

Offline Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,412
  • Gender: Male
  • Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God
    • The FairTax Plan
By utter coincidence, the groups that get preferential treatment just happen to be constituencies of the Democrat Party. /s

Yeah!  One hell of a Coincidink ain't it?
"I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.

"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."
- J. R. R. Tolkien