Ah, so it isn't in the Constitution after all. You simply made it up. Glad we got that clear. Perhaps if you were willing to discuss the legal and Constitutional aspects of this instead of consistently falling back on religion, then you wouldn't end up looking like a dishonest fool.
Speaking of dishonest fools,who is a bigger fool than someone that equates superstition with FACT. Care to discuss how old the universe is,Bubba? Virgin Birth? The accuracy of the Bible,a book so "accurate" it had to be rewritten?
That's really beautiful and all. But in no way does it address the challenge against your 'separation of church and state' fantasy. Clearly it is not in the Constitution. Yet you bring it up as if it has some sort of magical property. It doesn't. In addition, your non-rational response to your inability to show otherwise was rather pathetic.
You are confusing an individual's personal religious convictions with religious control of government. And by doing so, you are indirectly advocating secular control of government. This directly contradicts your 'separation of church and state' BS. But I digress.
Yes,you do,with the same old tired circular argument. All through history organized religions have seized control over governments and dictated to the people what they could and couldn't do. Anyone that tries to deny this is a liar.
But we're not talking about that red herring, are we? Again, no one here is advocating religion-controlled government. No one except for the secularist.
And you may want to learn what 'circular reasoning' actually is. Maybe next time, you can avoid looking like a complete fool.
Again, I challenge you to find a single example of someone advocating religious control of government. Bill Clinton didn't. Roy Moore doesn't. Heck, even someone like Jerry Falwell was not willing to discard the Constitution in favor of a theocracy.
Every Bible-Thumper that has ever lived. "Weeze gotta bring GAWD back to government!" Religious whackjobs are still whining about the removal of Blue Laws,for one example.
You clearly have no understanding of what religious control of government actually is. Iran has a religion-controlled government. We have a Constitutional government. And again, no one is advocating that we discard the Constitution and turn our government into a theocracy. No one.
Better a closed mind than being mindless. Proof of this is your lame accussation that I go into "emotional rants against God Himself!" I don't rant about imaginary creatures.
QED
*I* am not the one that worships a fictional Holy Ghost,or that believes in life after death.
Yet you are still a liar. Which is understandable since you openly admit that you have no moral compass other than your own mind.
Not going to play my game? YOU were the one making the claim. YOU were the one bringing it up. And now YOU are the one refusing to defend that claim. In other words, YOU are the liar here.
Give it a rest,drama queen. Your WHOLE DAMN LIFE is based on believing lies. Which is your right if that's what makes you happy.
Yet another complete disconnect with what was said. Again, you made the claim. Again, you refuse to defend that claim. Again, you are the liar.
You just WILL NOT be able to establish religious rule in America,no matter how many brain-damaged judges you run for public office.
I have zero desire to establish religious rule in America. I thought I made that plain in the beginning. Perhaps you should turn your emotions down a bit so you would have a clearer picture of what is going on here.
This whole thing between you and me started off because you brought up the 'separation of church and state' thingie which is NOT in the Constitution. And when challenged on this, you went ballistic on some religious tirade which has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Constitution - a document that I love dearly.
Guess what,Bubba? You are going to die,and when you die,that is the end of you,forever. You ain't coming back.
Your basis?
