The problem is that this is a non-story to begin with posted on a site so prejudiced that they called Melania's beautiful Christmas decorations 'creepy.' I guess they liked what Michelle did with Christmas.
If there is actually a valid story about Trump's doings, I will give it full credit and either support him or not.
Why is it a "non story"? Who is the final arbitrator of that? I believe that most intelligent people are able to read through news stories from any source and determine what they think about them without "the herd" telling them what is or is not a "non story" and which news sites are acceptable to the rest of the herd.
I happen to think it is a pretty big story when the POTUS knowingly hires someone like Flynn and then has to be dragged kicking and screaming to the oval office to fire his lying rear end. Not because you are disgusted by the man's behavior and lies, but because he has become a political liability. But that was back in the good old days when we still had moral expectations for the POTUS. I happen to think that Donald Trump isn't so much bothered by lying per se. He himself practices it all the time. As long as those lies benefit him in some way he seems to be okie dokie with it.
I don't know why calling someone a "Never Trumper" is an insult. I never thought that Trump was fit to be POTUS and I still don't. I was a "Never Hillary" voter too. I have very good well-thought out reasons why I wouldn't support Trump and those reasons have not changed. In fact his actions have done nothing but reinforce my first instincts about him. So just for the record, I won't be offended if someone calls me a "NT".