Yes, but only if you reject the rule of law and prefer a true tyranny - akin to a Christian form of sharia law - to that of a Constitutional republic.
The only tyranny of which we have suffered is from Federal Judges exceeding the bounds of their authority in making utterly ridiculous and nonsensical claims as to legislative intent.
I have read the debates on the 14th amendment. You will find no mention of homosexuals in them. You will find no mention of women being allowed to kill their babies in them. You will find no mention of banning the Christian religion in the states in those debates. You *WILL* find a discussion about whether or not "anchor babies" would be American Citizens, but in that discussion you will discover the Chief Architect of the law, (John Bingham) assures everyone that this will not happen.
Judges make up false law, precisely to get around legislative intent that does not speak to the result they want. The nation has no obligation to respect this fake law, and indeed a duty to not only oppose it, but to forcefully punish anyone who would usurp the authority of the legislative branch for their own personal preferences.
We are nation of laws, not of men - and certainly not of clerics and self-appointed religious police.
If you believed that, you would not advocate Judges making up fake "interpretations" of law, and then shoving them down our throats against our will.
You are on the side of the self-appointed religious police. You are on the side of tyrant judges.