Author Topic: Neil Gorsuch’s First Chance to Undermine the Administrative State  (Read 461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
National Review
Ilya Shapiro
Nov. 22, 2017

 A sleeper case could rein in the SEC.

When Neil Gorsuch was nominated to the Supreme Court, pundits focused on two aspects of his judicial record: his dedication to textualism in statutory interpretation and his skepticism of the growth of the administrative state. These beliefs align the justice with a growing chorus of lawyers and academics who think the judiciary has become too deferential to executive agencies, allowing bureaucrats to interpret statutes contrary to how Congress wrote them.

Well, later this month the Court will hear a case that, precisely because it doesn’t involve a hot-button issue such as immigration or transgender bathroom access, could be the perfect vehicle for reasserting judicial review of a relatively unfettered bureaucracy. Digital Realty v. Somers involves the question of who gets whistleblower protection under Dodd-Frank, an issue that is clearly addressed in the statute but has nonetheless bedeviled the courts, generating a jumble of contradictory rulings and confusion in the workplace.

More... http://www.nationalreview.com/article/453992/neil-gorsuch-chevron-scotus-case-strike-blow-deference

Online Free Vulcan

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,834
  • Gender: Male
  • Ah, the air is so much fresher here...
Re: Neil Gorsuch’s First Chance to Undermine the Administrative State
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2017, 03:53:53 pm »
Let's hope it falls on the correct side of the issue. Avalanches can start with small tremors.
The Republic is lost.

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
Re: Neil Gorsuch’s First Chance to Undermine the Administrative State
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2017, 04:22:14 pm »
Let's hope it falls on the correct side of the issue. Avalanches can start with small tremors.

Yes. As Shapiro indicated, this won't be a high profile case but could be a significant one.