So whatever happens between a man and a woman in their marriage means the woman deserves sexual abuse from someone later on. Got it, thanks.
@CatherineofAragon No, but an admitted adulteress is without honor, and in that, is not to be believed - Or not to be believed as easily as a woman of honor. So in the context of her relevance in the context of the narrative, I paid her no mind.
You're denying Moore's history, but that doesn't affect its relevance.
There is no history. *none*
I've also stated to you. over and over, my initial position concerning Moore, but you continue to ignore it and cast false witness. Whatever, I'll let you continue.
If you feel I've accused you directly, I assure you it was unintended.
Weinstein and Conyers have no tangible evidence against them, but you accept their histories just fine.
Both have settled suits on the record - That they weren't reported or were under-reported does not change the record.
Where are Conyers' and Weinstein's blue dresses and bastard children?
Like I said, settled law suites relating to sexual harassment/abuse. While it may not prove, it does show a pattern IN THE RECORD. And it is all incidental, as neither is honorable, to include Clinton and Tump as well. Men lacking honor are not comparable to men of honor, and I have no need to defend them in the least - and will not. Like Paula Jones, they are on their own.
He hasn't even conducted himself with honor financially, and that's hard fact.
No, it is not.
This comes down to a couple of things, regretfully....women should be summarily disbelieved, and Moore has an R behind his name.
Oh bullshit.
EVERYONE should be summarily disbelieved without evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. Proof requires evidence.
What lends credence to a person, man or woman, in the light of accusations without evidence, is character. What lends credence is keeping their word. Moore has that in spades, across decades. Accusations against him are extraordinary according to his character, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
And I am, as the record plainly shows, vociferously and vehemently anti-Republican - so as to that particular accusation - That dog won't hunt.
I am Conservative, and in that I find character and honor to be paramount - That is why I stand to defend honor, and why I will stand with Roy Moore. If an honorable man is not to be defended, then neither is an honorable woman. Be careful.
