What the Heck is Wrong with People?

[EasyAce]

By David French
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/453922/what-heck-wrong-people

Post-Weinstein America has outed its latest predator. None other than Charlie Rose . . .

. . . It’s amazing how many members of our so-called media elite are turning out to be disgusting,
exploitive, and crass. But lest we’d like to see our country run by the first 100 names we find in the
Alabama phone book, I give you Alabama pastor Earl Wise . . .

“I don’t know how much these women are getting paid, but I can
only believe they’re getting a healthy sum,” said pastor Earl Wise, a Moore
supporter from Millbrook, Ala.

Wise said he would support Moore even if the allegations were true and the
candidate was proved to have sexually molested teenage girls and women . . .

. . . Not to be outdone, meet pastor Franklin Raddish . .

"For 40 years, “these women didn’t say a word. They were cool
as a cucumber,” said pastor Franklin Raddish, a Baptist minister from
South Carolina and a Moore supporter.

“You’re asking me to believe them,’’ Raddish said, “when their own
mother didn’t have enough red blood in her to . . . go and report this?
Come on.”

There is a sickness loose in the land, and it is no respecter of ideologies, social class, or faiths.

[TomSea]

Has one ever thought, well, one vote, mine, wouldn't matter anyway. I think I'd not even vote. The Democratic view repels me... but, this is on the Republican candidate shoulders, he's not stepping down <---- Yes, the possibility exists he might be totally innocent.  It's a difficult call alright and one I would not be critical of others too much no matter how they vote. It does seem there are a few articles shaming those who would vote for Moore.  It might have been on Rush where everyone was saying, we need that Senate vote. Well, at this time, even having 52 votes isn't getting the job done, so 51? What might the difference be.

[corbe]

   This pendulum has always swung both ways and we may find ourselves back in the 50's or 60's when pretty much anything Men did was 'oh well', he's just a Man. I doubt, given the recent advances/history of relations between the sexes, particularly in the workplace, that we are entering a whole new dimension but all parameters are being thrown out the window in the interest of SJW types and political activist unaware of the consequences. Credibility is being lost.

[Bigun]

   This pendulum has always swung both ways and we may find ourselves back in the 50's or 60's when pretty much anything Men did was 'oh well', he's just a Man. I doubt, given the recent advances/history of relations between the sexes, particularly in the workplace, that we are entering a whole new dimension but all parameters are being thrown out the window in the interest of SJW types and political activist unaware of the consequences. Credibility is being lost.

Since Eve appeared on the Earth there has always been tension between men and women and I would dare to guess that there always will be as long as the two sexes exist.