The other three corroborate Moore's pattern of hitting on young girls. Remember this isn't about a criminal charge, but the pattern of creepy behavior.
So dating young women beyond the age of consent with their parent's consent is 'creepy behaviour'? (Just trying to get the lexicon straight.)
Well, just how old would they haave to be before it wasn't "creepy" any more?
Keep in mind that the age of consent is 16 in Alabama (still). Unlike France where they are debating establishing such a thing--at 13--because there hasn't been an age of consent there.
I'm curious because the age difference between POTUS and FLOTUS is nearly DOUBLE what is being claimed for Moore and the young ladies he expressed interest in, and those young ladies, at 17, were not only old enough, they claim there was no sexual contact.
That doesn't corroborate any claims of illicit behaviour, in fact, quite the opposite. It doesn't fit. Your 'evidence' just isn't.
He went out with respectable and unmarried single women, with the foreknowledge and consent of their parents, and that is in much starker contrast to any allegations of wrongdoing than any of you are willing to admit. not only that, but it's perfectly LEGAL. That, after West Point, two tours in the Army, and Law school, there were probably very few (if any) left in his age group who had not been rejected, divorced, or were simply not suitable as mates. Since the same problems generally apply to an older population (and we've seen what people think of that with the French President and his wife) the best prospects were those young ladies of respectable mien and families who were of age.
IRRELEVANT! It does not 'establish a pattern' of behaviour relevant to the accusations being made which might indicate some wrongdoing.