Gosh, Frank.
Clearly he believes that only a "hater" could possibly oppose someone on purely constitutional
ground, which has been the cause of my opposition to Moore
outside and regardless of whether
the sex crime accusations against him prove true or false. Though it's sadly disgraceful to see
Republicans compelled to defend (elect?) candidates accused of the kind of thing for which they'd
demand public executions without trial if the candidates in question were Democrats because, after
all, Democrats are so much more dangerous.
Either that or (considering he sees little enough distinction between a newspaper reporter who
once passed a few bad checks before she became a reporter or joined the
Washington Post,
the information I looked up wasn't exactly clear on the point, and a former judge who is accused
of committing a sexual crime with an underage girl at the time he was a district attorney) he really
could be ticketed for posting under the influence.