Some of the kids in that pic are old enough to understand Trump's comments.
The younger ones aren't, and don't care one way or the other...they just want the candy.
I would think that kids of political pundits are quite used to hearing political rhetoric...don't you think? Their parents do the mocking, and I'm sure these kids can handle themselves fine when they or their parents get mocked for political positions.
Look, I simply asked a question. Specifically, I asked:
Is it astonishing that children trick or treating in the White House might not totally understand Trump's sense of humor?
You replied:
[you can say that again]
Children these days are on the internet all the time. They probably know more about politics than most adults did 25 years ago.
You keep drawing conclusions about the children at today’s trick-or-treat event without providing the supporting evidence to back up your assertions. Specifically, you said children today were “on the internet all the time” and that “they probably know more about politics than most adults did 25 years ago.” That’s not my experience with trick-or-treat aged children today, and I simply asked for the justification of your apparent conclusion of what they “probably” concluded today. Apparently, you can’t/won’t justify your assertion. I’m not at all surprised.
Have a good night. I won't continue a dialogue with someone who makes assertions but refuses to back them up with facts.