Bannon endorses Ward, signaling Trump supporters have settled on a challenger to Flake

[Jazzhead]

Jeff Flake pulled strings with the Maricopa County Prosecutor to get his kid off the hook for animal cruelty charges stemming from allowing 23 dogs to die in the AZ heat when the Air Conditioning for the kennel failed because of his negligence.  Is that important to you?  I guess not.

Is a modicum of honesty and fairness important to you?   I guess not.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2016/07/12/roberts-did-arpaio-set-up-sen-jeff-flakes-son-green-acre-case/86997856/

[Cyber Liberty]

Is a modicum of honesty and fairness important to you?   I guess not.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/laurieroberts/2016/07/12/roberts-did-arpaio-set-up-sen-jeff-flakes-son-green-acre-case/86997856/

Laurie Roberts?    

Is that all you got?  I haven't believed a word that biased POS has written in at least 25 years.  No, I believe the customers of Flake's kid, who got screwed out of their day in Court because the Prosecutor's office played shenanigans with the Court Calendar. 

Go ahead and lap up what lefties tell you, though.  I would not deprive you of sustenance.  I know that's important to you.

[Cyber Liberty]

@Jazzhead you've been called on your feeble media links, and you are afraid to answer.  I laugh at you.

[Jazzhead]

@Jazzhead you've been called on your feeble media links, and you are afraid to answer.  I laugh at you.

 I'm from Philly, not Arizona.  If all you can say is you think the local reporter is a "biased POS",  why should that possibly cause me to respond?   I don't give a flip about your opinions of some local reporter.   I don't give a flip, honestly, about your opinions in general.  Plenty of folks here have my respect, and I read their posts with interest.  You're not one of them.   

What do you dispute, substantively, about the story?   

[Cyber Liberty]

I'm from Philly, not Arizona.  If all you can say is you think the local reporter is a "biased POS",  why should that possibly cause me to respond?   I don't give a flip about your opinions of some local reporter.   I don't give a flip, honestly, about your opinions in general.  Plenty of folks here have my respect, and I read their posts with interest.  You're not one of them.   

What do you dispute, substantively, about the story?   

It would take a 16 page dissertation to explain what's wrong with that writer, and a few more to explain what's wrong with that article. I would begin by pointing out she's not a reporter, she's an editorial writer. 

You mind is already made up, and you will fabricate whatever you need to refute what I write, so it would have been a waste of time.  I fully expected the reply I just quoted.  Believe whatever you want.  It's my vote that counts, not yours.

Since you have no respect for my posts, why am I not on ignore, anyway?  As for people respecting yours, I'd love to see some sort of study on that, you have a highly inflated sense of value.  As the resident left-wing crackpot, people read your comments out of a morbid curiosity that you can even form words.

[Bigun]

It would take a 16 page dissertation to explain what's wrong with that writer, and a few more to explain what's wrong with that article. I would begin by pointing out she's not a reporter, she's an editorial writer. 

You mind is already made up, and you will fabricate whatever you need to refute what I write, so it would have been a waste of time.  I fully expected the reply I just quoted.  Believe whatever you want.  It's my vote that counts, not yours.

Since you have no respect for my posts, why am I not on ignore, anyway?  As for people respecting yours, I'd love to see some sort of study on that, you have a highly inflated sense of value.  As the resident left-wing crackpot, people read your comments out of a morbid curiosity that you can even form words.

I read them not at all unless someone else quotes one as you did!   Just sayin! 

[Jazzhead]

It would take a 16 page dissertation to explain what's wrong with that writer, and a few more to explain what's wrong with that article. I would begin by pointing out she's not a reporter, she's an editorial writer. 

You mind is already made up, and you will fabricate whatever you need to refute what I write, so it would have been a waste of time.  I fully expected the reply I just quoted.  Believe whatever you want.  It's my vote that counts, not yours.

Since you have no respect for my posts, why am I not on ignore, anyway?  As for people respecting yours, I'd love to see some sort of study on that, you have a highly inflated sense of value.  As the resident left-wing crackpot, people read your comments out of a morbid curiosity that you can even form words.

I've never placed anyone on ignore.  Not my style.   I appreciate anyone who takes the time to read what I write, and respond.    Agree or disagree,  I read 'em all.  And every word I write is simply my opinion, as honestly expressed as I can make it.   I've been called a left-wing crackpot and a right-wing nutjob.   That I hear it from both sides is music to my ears.  The solutions to our problems lie in engagement, not retreating behind ideological labels and clichés.   

The spirit of true debate is what animates me.   It has been ever since I was introduced to it when I was a member of the Political Union at college.    I get so many thoughtful responses to what I post,  along with the whiners and trash-talkers.   The many folks I respect here are what keep me hanging around.  I'm sorry that you haven't managed to drive me away yet.  Keep trying.     

[Cyber Liberty]

I read them not at all unless someone else quotes one as you did!   Just sayin! 

I'm sure you are in good company on that.   

[Cyber Liberty]

I've never placed anyone on ignore.  Not my style.   I appreciate anyone who takes the time to read what I write, and respond.    Agree or disagree,  I read 'em all.  And every word I write is simply my opinion, as honestly expressed as I can make it.   I've been called a left-wing crackpot and a right-wing nutjob.   That I hear it from both sides is music to my ears.  The solutions to our problems lie in engagement, not retreating behind ideological labels and clichés.   

The spirit of true debate is what animates me.   It has been ever since I was introduced to it when I was a member of the Political Union at college.    I get so many thoughtful responses to what I post,  along with the whiners and trash-talkers.   The many folks I respect here are what keep me hanging around.  I'm sorry that you haven't managed to drive me away yet.  Keep trying.   

Be that as it may, I'm not going to waste time explaining to you why an article, written by an editorial writer, about Sheriff Joe Arpaio (not Flake or his kid) is irrelevant to the discussion.  We'd end up having one of your worthless "debates" on the article, not the case.

I'm so glad you love your debating style.  Somebody should.  Personally, I find your circle-talk style boring and unmoving.  I'm still wondering why you bother, when you've made it so clear you have no respect for me anyway.  Life's too short to deal with self-important leftist creeps who don't respect me anyway.  Now scoot. 

There are too many people who matter that need to hear about what I have to say.  Some jackass in Philly doesn't make the list.

[Jazzhead]

  Some jackass in Philly doesn't make the list.

If that's how you feel you need to respond, so be it.  But if you're ever in Philly, I'll be pleased to pour you a dram of my best bourbon.   

[Cyber Liberty]

Why would I share a drink of fine Bourbon with somebody who's declared he doesn't respect me?  No.

[txradioguy]

It would take a 16 page dissertation to explain what's wrong with that writer, and a few more to explain what's wrong with that article. I would begin by pointing out she's not a reporter, she's an editorial writer. 

You mind is already made up, and you will fabricate whatever you need to refute what I write, so it would have been a waste of time.  I fully expected the reply I just quoted.  Believe whatever you want.  It's my vote that counts, not yours.

Since you have no respect for my posts, why am I not on ignore, anyway?  As for people respecting yours, I'd love to see some sort of study on that, you have a highly inflated sense of value.  As the resident left-wing crackpot, people read your comments out of a morbid curiosity that you can even form words.

@Cyber Liberty

He's in knee jerk response mode.  If you're against it...he must be for it.

It's the whole enemy of my enemy thing.

[txradioguy]

Jeff Flake, Arizona’s junior senator, scores 53 out of 100 on Conservative Review's Liberty Scale.

[Jazzhead]

Why would I share a drink of fine Bourbon with somebody who's declared he doesn't respect me?  No.

Should I respect someone as graceless as you? 

[kevindavis007]

If I was in AZ I would vote for Flake.  Not some dips**t who holds tax payer funded hearings over Chemtrails.


As for the Liberty score by the Conservative review. Sorry I don't trust them with a 10 foot pole.

[Bigun]

If I was in AZ I would vote for Flake.  Not some dips**t who holds tax payer funded hearings over Chemtrails.


As for the Liberty score by the Conservative review. Sorry I don't trust them with a 10 foot pole.

If I lived in Arizona my vote would cancel yours out!

[truth_seeker]

As soon as the heat lets up my wife and I are heading to AZ to see the chemtrails.

[Cyber Liberty]

If I lived in Arizona my vote would cancel yours out!

I'm the one with a vote.  Heh.

[Cyber Liberty]

As soon as the heat lets up my wife and I are heading to AZ to see the chemtrails.

They're PURTY this time of the year!

[DiogenesLamp]

If that's how you feel you need to respond, so be it.  But if you're ever in Philly, I'll be pleased to pour you a dram of my best bourbon.

I have a good friend from Philly.   He says Will Smith was an annoying little kid in his neighborhood back when he was young.