Author Topic: The false promise of Executive Orders  (Read 374 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,384
The false promise of Executive Orders
« on: October 18, 2017, 05:20:37 pm »

The false promise of Executive Orders
 October 17, 2017   
By Benjamin Wilhelm 
   

There have been any number of paradigm shifts among the electorate since Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. Most of these make the relatively few people I would consider sane shake their heads in awe at the sheer hypocrisy.

Obama’s lavish spending on himself and his family at taxpayer expense were somehow horrible but Trump’s is fine? The unprecedented number of golf outings when there is serious work to be done? How about the creation of division and the attacking of media outlets that don’t suck up to the Commander-in-Chief?

Chief among these is the use of Executive Orders (EOs) to legislate from the Oval Office when the President can’t get Congress to do what he wants. Those that decried Obama’s use of EOs are now praising Trump’s. Why? Because he’s doing what they want.

<..snip..>

http://noqreport.com/2017/10/17/false-promise-executive-orders/
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline Concerned

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,848
  • Gender: Male
Re: The false promise of Executive Orders
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2017, 06:57:28 pm »
Really good OpEd.   Trump may have been a good negotiator on real estate deals, but he's not provided much evidence, so far, that he can translate these supposed skills into legislative victories.  Many of our truly persuasive and deal-making Presidents have gotten their legislative agendas through Congress based largely on the strength of their ability to lead, persuade, and/or negotiate.  LBJ was a master of this.  Reagan also did a good job of it by coopting Speaker of the House O’Neill.  Clinton did the same with New Gingrich on a variety of legislative objectives.  That’s what true leaders do.  That’s what true deal-makers do.    I have fully expected Trump to do this as well, but he obviously doesn’t have the attention to detail to leverage the gravitas of his office to formulate and make deals to get his legislative agenda through Congress.  From the link in the OP:

"Trump’s following of cult-like sycophants argue that the President’s own party is working against him. There is no doubt this is true. I won’t argue that. My response?

Too bad. Governing is HARD WORK. The man who claimed all through the primaries that he was the best choice because he could get things done no matter the composition of Congress because he “makes the best deals” has been found impotent in making any legislative impact at all. He seems to have expected everyone to just do whatever he wanted without question.

Obama passed Obamacare with ONLY Democrat votes, but even then it took months of lobbying members of his own party to vote for and pass the bill.

Passing a major bill takes laser-like focus for weeks or months. Trump can’t even focus on a single topic for an hour of tweeting. When he deregulated coal recently his tweets, if any, should have been focused on touting that, and ONLY that. Instead he spent the time making empty threats against NBC’s broadcasting license.

Trump should have spent the first month of his Administration getting the right people in place and firing the Obama holdovers, otherwise known as “draining the swamp.” Instead, far too many Obama appointees are still there while it took forever to get Trump’s cabinet in place, and then replaced as too many have been fired or resigned. So much for “hiring the best people.”

Then there should have been laser focus on repealing Obamacare and immigration reform, and they should have been plans resembling something he designed. Instead he blames Congress for not having a plan. While a legitimate complaint, he had no plan either."
I adore facts and data and abhor lies and liars.