Alabama GOP Senate Candidate Uses Racial Slurs in Speech

[TomSea]

Mo Brooks I believe was the one to vote for in the initial ballot,

They said Mo Brooks would have defeated Moore but that Moore would defeat Luther Strange.

But that's a bit beside the point, Moore served in Vietnam, I see him as outspoken, I don't see him necessarily as someone seeking attention.

This is a bit off topic though from the original quote, I don't see any real wrong in the original words.

[Fishrrman]

This article is from NBC news, the
Nuthin'
But
Communism
network.

But what plays to their audiences in places other than Alabama, don't play so well down there.

I sense this won't hurt Judge Moore's chances at all.

May even help a little...  ;)

[Hoodat]

I'm still wondering why Trump is supporting Strange, who is weak on illegal immigration.

Trump is supporting Strange because Strange is the Establishment candidate straight out of the K-Street swamp.  It's what Trump does.

[kevindavis007]

Trump is supporting Strange because Strange is the Establishment candidate straight out of the K-Street swamp.  It's what Trump does.

and Bannon supports Moore.. Good enough reason for me to back Strange if I was in Alabama.

[Sanguine]

and Bannon supports Moore.. Good enough reason for me to back Strange if I was in Alabama.

Really?  That's all it takes?  No thinking involved in making an informed decision? 

[txradioguy]

and Bannon supports Moore.. Good enough reason for me to back Strange if I was in Alabama.

So the fact that Strange will back McConnell and vote how he's told...even if it is a vote in favor of Liberal socialist BS doesn't bother you?

What about the fact that McConnell has threatened and bullied any consulting firm thinking about doing business with anyone but Luther Strange?

A vote for Strange is a strange vote indeed since he's just going to support the same old crap in DC.

[TomSea]

I like and respect Roy Moore but with such rhetoric being bandied about, expect one more opinionated Senator who likely won't get a lot done. If one calls doing nothing conservatism, then have at it.

[Sanguine]

I like and respect Roy Moore but with such rhetoric being bandied about, expect one more opinionated Senator who likely won't get a lot done. If one calls doing nothing conservatism, then have at it.

Tom, what does that mean?

[kevindavis007]

Really?  That's all it takes?  No thinking involved in making an informed decision?

Yep, cause Bannon is no Conservative.

[kevindavis007]

So the fact that Strange will back McConnell and vote how he's told...even if it is a vote in favor of Liberal socialist BS doesn't bother you?

What about the fact that McConnell has threatened and bullied any consulting firm thinking about doing business with anyone but Luther Strange?

A vote for Strange is a strange vote indeed since he's just going to support the same old crap in DC.

I like McConnell. I just don't like loser blowhards like Moore.

[TomSea]

Tom, what does that mean?

The American people don't elect officials for gridlock.

Yes, during Obama's presidency, we wanted to stop what he would have done but it didn't stop him all that well per executive orders.

I think the American people, not all, do wish to see Washington actually work and get things done.

[Hoodat]

Tom, what does that mean?

It means Tom is backing the GOP Establishment.

[txradioguy]

I like McConnell. I just don't like loser blowhards like Moore.

Then why are you here?  Because clearly a meeting spot for Conservatives isn't for you.

You like a guy who did everything he could to ram Obama's agenda down our throats.  Colluded with Big Ears during Congressional recess' and undermined Conservatives in the senate at every turn.

And you have no problem with that?

[txradioguy]

The American people don't elect officials for gridlock.

Yes, during Obama's presidency, we wanted to stop what he would have done but it didn't stop him all that well per executive orders.

I think the American people, not all, do wish to see Washington actually work and get things done.

Send Luther Strange...a McConnell lapdog to the Senate won't change anything one iota.

[Sanguine]

The American people don't elect officials for gridlock.

Yes, during Obama's presidency, we wanted to stop what he would have done but it didn't stop him all that well per executive orders.

I think the American people, not all, do wish to see Washington actually work and get things done.

Well, of course that entirely depends on what they are trying to get done.  I'm OK with gridlock if they're going to do the wrong thing.

[kevindavis007]

Then why are you here?  Because clearly a meeting spot for Conservatives isn't for you.

You like a guy who did everything he could to ram Obama's agenda down our throats.  Colluded with Big Ears during Congressional recess' and undermined Conservatives in the senate at every turn.

And you have no problem with that?

So basically you this site to be like the TOS? I dare you to have me banned.


Far as I'm concerned he did not ram Obama's agenda down our throat contrary to what to those morons and so called Tea Party groups had said.

[Sanguine]

Yep, cause Bannon is no Conservative.

So if you wouldn't listen to Bannon on other issues, why would you let him determine what you think on this issue?

[kevindavis007]

So if you wouldn't listen to Bannon on other issues, why would you let him determine what you think on this issue?

When it comes to economics this guy is no conservative. I see him more as a populist.

[skeeter]

Yep, cause Bannon is no Conservative.

But you like McConnell.

You sound confused.

[txradioguy]

So basically you this site to be like the TOS? I dare you to have me banned.

I said that?  Why would I want you banned?  That thought never crossed my mind.

And like the Mods would seriously ever listen to me on something like that anyway. 

Far as I'm concerned he did not ram Obama's agenda down our throat contrary to what to those morons and so called Tea Party groups had said.

TEA Party "morons"?  Interesting.

McConnell helped get Obama's TPA passed (Ryan helped push it through in the House)...helped get the awful deal with Iran ushered through the Senate illegally. 

He surrendered treaty approval powers over to the President. 

Did nothing to repeal Obamacare didn't even try and he's still not trying despite saying in December 2016 that "When we come back January 3 we’ll be moving to the Obamacare replacement resolution. The Obamacare repeal resolution will be the first item up in the New Year,"  So far we've got squat.

McConnell had his hands all over the infamous $1.1 trillion CRomnibus bill. 

And that's just what I remember off the top of my head.  At heart he's a pro choice pro union Moderate who changes his stance on issues when the wind changes direction.  He's about getting power...increasing his power and nothing more.

He's part of the problem in DC and you seem perfectly fine with that.

[Hoodat]

Yep, cause Bannon is no Conservative.

That explains why he backed Trump.

[XenaLee]

So the fact that Strange will back McConnell and vote how he's told...even if it is a vote in favor of Liberal socialist BS doesn't bother you?

What about the fact that McConnell has threatened and bullied any consulting firm thinking about doing business with anyone but Luther Strange?

A vote for Strange is a strange vote indeed since he's just going to support the same old crap in DC.

Which is probably why Trump supports him.  Gotta refill that swamp, dontcha know.  With the establishment guys that are Trump guys, that is.

[XenaLee]

I like McConnell. I just don't like loser blowhards like Moore.

Seriously?  You actually "like" McConnell???   Uh..... I sure as hell wouldn't admit it if I did.   

[XenaLee]

Then why are you here?  Because clearly a meeting spot for Conservatives isn't for you.

You like a guy who did everything he could to ram Obama's agenda down our throats.  Colluded with Big Ears during Congressional recess' and undermined Conservatives in the senate at every turn.

And you have no problem with that?

And let's not forget..... a guy who gave Obama even MORE than he and the rats had asked for in that budget "deal".   McConnell isn't any mere sellout.  He is yet another ultimate Manchurian Candidate Trojan Horse that the GOP is currently infested with.

[XenaLee]

When it comes to economics this guy is no conservative. I see him more as a populist.

You mean..... like Trump.

Well....duh.