@MOD3 - Hey, I found it!
This is, let's not forget, all about baking a lousy cake. Better to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court rather than bake a cake for a homosexual couple.
The baker in question did offer to bake a cake for the customers in question. He simply declined to make a type of cake that he does not offer.
(The sexual preference of those two customers is unknown. Only a bigot would make assumptions in this regard.)
So your premise is completely without merit. And if you can't even get the first premise right, what does that say for your argument?
Imagine for a moment that you owned a business where you made cuckoo clocks out of wood. Someone comes into your shop and orders a cuckoo clock made out of dragon tree wood. You flatly refuse, while offering to make the clock out of some other type of wood. You may have refused because you are a member of an arbor conservation society and recognize dragon trees as being endangered. Or you may have refused because you have an allergy to dragon tree wood. Or perhaps you refused because you have a select set of woods that you work with, and limit your clock making to woods on that list. It really doesn't matter why. All that matters is that commerce is an exchange between buyer and seller, and if either side balks, there is no commerce. The buyer cannot be compelled to buy. And the seller cannot be compelled to sell. It is an open exchange where both parties agree at a certain price.
Yet you are willing to discard the very heart and soul of commerce and replace it with the tyranny of your will. This has become a habit with you.