Ph.D. Physicist Uses Empirical Data To Assert CO2 Greenhouse Theory A ‘Phantasm’ To Be ‘Neglected’

[rangerrebew]

Ph.D. Physicist Uses Empirical Data To Assert CO2 Greenhouse Theory A ‘Phantasm’ To Be ‘Neglected’

By Kenneth Richard on 4. September 2017
 New Paper: Experiment Reveals No Detectable
‘Greenhouse’ Difference Between CO2 And Air

Below is a very abridged quoted summary of a new scientific paper published by Dr. Thomas Allmendinger, a physicist (chemistry, quantum mechanics) who uses a real-world experiment to document a glaring lack of empirical support for the position that CO2 is a dominant agent of atmospheric warming.

http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.uBc77k0X.sBFSQfeM.dpbs
One-sentence summary: Shortwave radiation heats both CO2 and air only up to a limited temperature threshold, and there is no observed difference between the heat absorption/emission of  air vs. CO2. 

[Free Vulcan]

Finally. Not even a scientist and it's easy to see that CO2 does not have the effect that 'scientists' claim it does on temperature.

[Suppressed]

I'm curious what he proposes as the mechanism that yields a very strong correlation between CO₂ and temperature in the geologic record.  For example, when huge deposits of coal burned in the late Paleozoic, the temperature shot up.  It wasn't just heat from the fires!