Well, here's some advice that may be of help to you with this @Smokin Joe : A simple "well done" and/or "I agree with this" would suffice. Explaining how one never supported Trump and still does not ... but in this one case ..... really serves to diminish the credibility of even the momentary support for the President's achievement.
Okay, I think I see the problem right there. If you think that giving kudos IN SPITE of not supporting someone diminishes the compliment, you are sadly misguided. It is an affirmation that they believe in this instance he has done the correct thing. Nothing less.
If you think that diminishes the compliment, then I'd wager you have never given someone you either did not like or had severe reservations about credit when they were due that credit. Otherwise, you'd know.
It's a signal that the poster is holding onto a grudge and still not rooting for the success of the President and his agenda.
It is an affirmation that that person thinks he got it right this time. Some of us call that being "fair".
Expecting a parade for such fleeting and shallow support tends to reek of self-righteousness. Expecting applause, too, only worsens it.
Self righteousness? Point that finger and see how many point back at you. That a person could overcome revulsion to give someone credit for doing the right thing is a measure of fairness, not shallow support for that particular action, but wholehearted agreement in that instance. If that seems like fleeting support, maybe they should act that way more often.
As has been said, repeatedly, when he does right, I'll give credit when credit is due. When he screws up, I'll say so, and I'll apply the same standard to any person, anywhere, anytime.
If what you want is undying fealty, 'The Donald right or wrong!", that just isn't going to happen, nor should it. As for wanting applause, no, just a cessation of the lies about how people on this site never give Trump any credit. It diminishes the posters who assert it, and the site, too.