« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2017, 09:11:00 pm »
To summarize:
With Garcetti, however, the world changed. The Supreme Court’s holding in that case was brutal and short: “When public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline.”
Let’s put this in plain English. If an employer can prove that the public employee was speaking as part of his job, then the First Amendment flat-out does not apply, no matter the public importance of his speech. That means the public employer has essentially “purchased” the speech of its employees. [...]
Logged
+++++++++
“In the outside world, I'm a simple geologist. But in here .... I am Falcor, Defender of the Alliance†--Randy Marsh
“The most effectual means of being secure against pain is to retire within ourselves, and to suffice for our own happiness.†-- Thomas Jefferson
“He's so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent.†--Foghorn Leghorn