LETTER: McMaster RENEWED top-secret security clearance for Susan Rice AFTER unmasking revealed!

[DB]

Odd quirk of classified information - if you lose your clearance rating on things you " 'originated, reviewed, signed or received while serving,' " - you can't be questioned about them in court or in congress, as you no longer are permitted to discuss them at all.

Just sayin. 

That's how I read it. I think this was required in order for her to be questioned by congress/investigators. This may also remove the excuse that it is "classified" information that she can't comment on.

[DB]

Still waiting for your answer, Cyber.

If you had the power to unmask, what would you do if you saw an intelligence report that stated:

"An unnamed U.S. individual contacted the ISIL commander in Syria."

or

"An unnamed U.S. individual met with Vladimir Putin to discuss ways to circumvent existing US sanctions on Iran."

The issue isn't the identifying of those people for security reasons and keeping it otherwise hidden. It is disseminating that unmasked information to others outside the security apparatus for political purposes - that is the issue.

[Bigun]

I'm going to start a running list in my signature of all the times someone is accused of being a "leftist" on TBR.

Congrats genius, you just made it.

Whatever toots your whistle WTF!  I don't give two hoots and hell what you do or think!

[EC]

That's how I read it. I think this was required in order for her to be questioned by congress/investigators. This may also remove the excuse that it is "classified" information that she can't comment on.

Yep. But hey, McMaster is this weeks target, according to the various sources. So it must be part of a cunning plan.

[Cyber Liberty]

Yep. But hey, McMaster is this weeks target, according to the various sources. So it must be part of a cunning plan.

I don't really know enough about this to have a serious opinion, other than to note McMaster seems to think Flynn's appointees are worse than Obama era appointees. 

[DB]

I don't really know enough about this to have a serious opinion, other than to note McMaster seems to think Flynn's appointees are worse than Obama era appointees. 

This particular story is about Susan Rice and McMaster. That's all I was commenting on.

[Cyber Liberty]

This particular story is about Susan Rice and McMaster. That's all I was commenting on.

...which is why I was commenting on @EC's comment?

[DB]

...which is why I was commenting on @EC's comment?

I'm not arguing. Just pointing out I know zip about McMaster and that this particular news story involving Susan Rice may make some sense without being sinister.

[Cyber Liberty]

I'm not arguing. Just pointing out I know zip about McMaster and that this particular news story involving Susan Rice may make some sense without being sinister.

Just joshing you.  I don't know diddly squat about the situation either. ^-^