See @CatherineofAragon
@jpsb See what? Did you read the article? The author didn't really debunk anything, despite his claim that he did.
Here's his reasoning:
Firstly, it didn't happen because Trump denied it. Well, we know Trump's relationship with the truth, though, right?
Secondly, it isn't true because the NYT repeated what was originally reported. (?)
Thirdly, Curl acknowledges that Trump has a lying problem, but he's giving him the edge, because "he's the president." LOL,
what?Then Curl continues throwing things at the wall and says maybe Trump was kidding. But Trump's Twitter denial implied no such thing.
Next, he characterizes Trump's comment as "spitting venom", in an attempt to further delegitimize the interviewer's claim. But I don't think it was that, do you? Think what you want about Trump; he doesn't say things like this to be deliberately malevolent. He says them because he has no filter and he can't stop revealing his lack of character.
I think I've read pretty good articles written by Joseph Curl, but this one is just poorly thought out. It's kind of obvious that he doesn't want the comment to be true.
Are we going to include Golf Magazine in the roster of globalist deep state fake media now? Just because one line out of an extensive interview reported something Trump fans don't like? If we are, then we might as well give up and just accept that only Gateway Pundit, Conservative Treehouse, Breitbart, and Free Republic are credible sources.
By the way, The Hill just published an article saying eight or nine people witnessed Trump's remark and the author stands by his story.
I'm also going to note that I responded to your ping as soon as I saw it, but you refused to answer me yesterday when I asked you three times what you thought of Trump's comment.
