The Democrats "Rising Star", Radical Kamala Harris

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

frontpagemag
July 26, 2017
John Perazzo
A look at the radical record of Kamala Harris.

[excerpt]

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/267385/democrats-rising-star-john-perazzo

As House and Senate Democrats press forward with their quest to destroy Donald Trump's presidency by any means necessary, they are simultaneously focused on finding someone in their ranks who could be an effective presidential candidate for their own party in 2020. Fifty-three-year-old Kamala Harris, who served as the Attorney General of California from 2011-16 and then filled the vacant U.S. Senate seat that had been occupied for a quarter-century by Barbara Boxer, is someone whom they will undoubtedly look at very closely. To be sure, Harris possesses all the qualifications necessary to be a Democratic leader, insofar as she is a far leftist in the mold of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton — but without the baggage of Obama's extensive ties to domestic terrorists, anti-Semites, and America-hating Marxists, or of Hillary's status as a money-grubbing thief who feloniously violated the Espionage Act more times than anyone can count.

Consider, for instance, Harris's stance on immigration. In December 2012, during her tenure as California's Attorney General, she issued a memo informing all the executives of law-enforcement agencies statewide that they could “make their own decisions about whether to fulfill” Immigration & Customs Enforcement detainers, which are temporary holds that federal immigration authorities place on municipal prisoners who are suspected of being eligible for deportation.

After an illegal alien named Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez — a convicted felon who had been deported from the United States on five separate occasions — was released from prison in April 2015 and subsequently murdered a 32-year-old San Francisco woman named Kathryn Steinle, Harris backed up the city sheriff's decision to release Lopez-Sanchez without first calling immigration authorities.

[truth_seeker]

A re-run blend of black-female, and extreme leftist. 

Sure to pick up all of the aggrieved minorities. But unlike Obama who portrayed a moderate image to start, she is already clearly too extreme to fool middle class whites.

the white-guilt play will not work, after Obama.

[dfwgator]

So Lieawatha isn't running?

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

A re-run blend of black-female, and extreme leftist. 

Sure to pick up all of the aggrieved minorities. But unlike Obama who portrayed a moderate image to start, she is already clearly too extreme to fool middle class whites.

the white-guilt play will not work, after Obama.

She replaced Barbara Boxer in the Senate.

And you're absolutely certain people aren't stupid enough to vote her in?

After they voted Boxer in?

[truth_seeker]

She replaced Barbara Boxer in the Senate.

And you're absolutely certain people aren't stupid enough to vote her in?

After they voted Boxer in?

Nationally, she comes up short I think.

A case where non-college people in Fly-over states, are more wise than college grads in California, NY, etc.

[Wingnut]

So Lieawatha isn't running?

The paleface spoke with forked tongue and lost the redskin vote.