The man promotes violence as a weapon in the political arena. You call it insight and thinking. I call it repulsive.
Quite the opposite. Full sentence:
But if that's what this people want - which apparently seems to be the case for both the Marxist Left and the Populists - they shall have it.
Considering he has disavowed the actions of both sides, his implication that the Left and the Populists will have violence if they want it is in no way an advocacy thereof, merely a conditional prediction of impending conflict.
However, your selective editing of his post to imply he did want blood in the streets or was making a threat is prima facie evidence of dishonesty on your part.