Author Topic: Feehery: Returning to Civility  (Read 765 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Farish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50
  • Gender: Female
  • Hail to the Redskins!
Some of it's magic
And some of it's tragic
But I've had a good life
All the way--Buffett

Offline Joe Wooten

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,455
  • Gender: Male
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2017, 04:07:42 pm »
Too late for that. The lefties blew right through the point of no return on November 9, 2016.

Online roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,153
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2017, 04:23:43 pm »
Too late for that. The lefties blew right through the point of no return on November 9, 2016.

Of far more concern are the 'righties' who did the very same thing.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2017, 04:24:02 pm by roamer_1 »

Offline Joe Wooten

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,455
  • Gender: Male
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2017, 04:28:51 pm »
Of far more concern are the 'righties' who did the very same thing.

Mostly in retaliation. How long would you let someone kick you in the nuts without hitting back?

Online roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,153
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2017, 04:41:11 pm »
Mostly in retaliation. How long would you let someone kick you in the nuts without hitting back?

It is a battle of ideas. The left resorts to foul play and fake news because it's all they've got.
The 'right', doing the same thing indicates the same conclusion.

The high ground requires responsibility.

The ends never justify the means.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,792
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2017, 10:36:23 pm »
roamer wrote:
"The high ground requires responsibility.
The ends never justify the means."


Point of order:
I've said it before and I'll say it again (although it's off-topic):

In the war between islam and The West, the victory of the The West -is- justified by using whatever means become necessary to win. The alternative is unacceptable.

"Higher ground" means nothing (as in, "zero") if you're dead.

Online roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44,153
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2017, 10:42:57 pm »
roamer wrote:
"The high ground requires responsibility.
The ends never justify the means."


Point of order:
I've said it before and I'll say it again (although it's off-topic):

In the war between islam and The West, the victory of the The West -is- justified by using whatever means become necessary to win. The alternative is unacceptable.

"Higher ground" means nothing (as in, "zero") if you're dead.

Quite beside the point, and without much effect, as in a battle with the Mohammedans, the high ground is easily taken. Rising to defend is high ground anyway, and against a people who skin humans alive, burn humans, heave them off of high places, and crucify them, leaves literal hectares of high ground.

But, whether one might win or not has everything to do with just cause, and just cause requires a moral people. When one is deliberately defying the laws of God, one cannot expect His favor.

Online bigheadfred

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,658
  • Gender: Male
  • One day Closer
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2017, 11:36:43 pm »
First, the American people are not in a civil mood.

Yes, they are too in a civil mood. Aimed at the war ending instead of the ity ending.
She asked me name my foe then. I said the need within some men to fight and kill their brothers without thought of Love or God. Ken Hensley

Offline Hondo69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,673
  • The more I know the less I understand
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2017, 08:49:41 am »
A civil mood as in Civil War mood?

HonestJohn

  • Guest
Re: Feehery: Returning to Civility
« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2017, 08:40:19 pm »
Mostly in retaliation. How long would you let someone kick you in the nuts without hitting back?

When a certain someone tells a rally that he'd like to punch his opposition's supporters in the face or offers to pay the legal fees of those supporters who commit violence...

...then it's pretty obvious where the problem began.

Now that the shoe is on the other foot, some are now aghast?

(Edited for spelling)
« Last Edit: June 24, 2017, 01:42:58 am by HonestJohn »