U.S. Muslims outraged by protests against Islamic law. Does CAIR want Shariah to replace Constitution?

[rangerrebew]

U.S. Muslims outraged by protests against Islamic law
Does CAIR want Shariah to replace Constitution?
Published: 8 hours ago
 

If the Council on American-Islamic Relations is in the United States simply to protect the civil rights of Muslims according to the law of the land, why would it object to protests against the implementation of a religious law that ultimately conflicts with the U.S. Constitution?

That’s the question that arises in response to CAIR’s outrage against the rallies organized by the group Act for America in more than 20 U.S. cities Saturday dubbed “March Against Shariah, March for Human Rights.”

Act for America said the event was in “memory and support of victims of FGM (female genital mutilation), honor killings and violence toward the LGBTQ community in the name of religion, culture and foreign law.”

http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/u-s-muslims-outraged-by-protests-against-islamic-law/

[Fishrrman]

"Does CAIR want Shariah to replace Constitution?"

If you dare to ask the question, you'd better be prepared for the answer.

[RoosGirl]

According to at least one person here it's bigoted to bring up such things (genital mutilation, honor killings, etc.) in relation to Islam.

[INVAR]

According to both the Quran and the Hadiths in Islamic estacheology - all laws that exist outside of Sharia are null and void.

In Islamic thinking, the Constitution is irrelevant.  Sharia is all that matters.

The deal is that Sharia Law is incompatible with every single foundational principle that related to liberty on any scale.

Islam is a political/religious system of subjugation and forced submission.  Liberty and freedom are incompatible with it.

But don't take my word for it - just let the Muslim's themselves tell you: