Well, whenever Coulter-bashing begins ( picking on her for her appearance? Really?) with self-described conservatives, the thought always arises that there is no equivalent to this with self-described liberals (leftists).
Whatever one may think of Coulter's style, rhetoric or policy/candidate endorsements, when things get down to the brass tacks of essential issues, Coulter is almost always on the right side of things.
The differences that most self-described conservatives have are almost wholly in approach to improving things, not whether things need to be improved or not.
If leftists have a serious flaw of not being critical enough of their own, conservatives have the opposite flaw, in being too quick to dismiss and condemn other self-described conservatives wholesale for unforgiveable "crimes".
I will take Ann Coulter any day over any self-described leftist.
It is disturbing to me the degree to which some self-described conservatives seem willing to declare that only doctrinaire "true believers" who mirror their own laundry list of "correct conservative thought" are fit to be called "decent conservatives".
If conservatives have an issue with being too intolerant IMO, it isn't in their attitudes on race or leftist failings, but in the degree that intolerance is displayed to those of their own camp who "stray off the reservation" in a fairly small percentage of the key fundamental issues which separate leftists from conservatives.
I differed with Coulter on things over the years (her too-swift endorsement of Chris Christie which she thankfully later withdrew) but even then, I remained conscious of the fact that after all was said and done, we still had more in common than in conflict than I had with any self-described liberal.
There is an odd sadistic streak in some who are ready, willing and able to go to a place of intrasigent, harsh condemnation in regrd to other self-described conservatives.
I myself was guilty of that to some degree with Suppressed, when we clashed over some aspects of AGW. I have appologised to him in PM for that and learned a lesson about myself.
JRR Tolkien's
Silmarillion is about that very thing - the proclivity for good people to fail to recognize the value of faith and steadfast loyalty to their own kind over the long haul, and hence the danger of being overcome by wickedness (especially the sort which plays into the passion good people often have for purity, and their dedication to remaining firm in the face of challenge).
