So you're saying that the following statements he made are ALL false:
1) On Mike flynn: "I didn’t even really talk to him… That’s the extent of my acquaintance with Mr. Flynn.”
Probably true as a lie would be exposed in time. But then, any shady deals should be with intermediaries and not Numero Uno.
2) On the US Elections “no specific evidence, no facts, just assumptions and allegations” to back their conclusion that the Kremlin attempted to assist Donald Trump in the election."
Is there a reason they would want Trump rather than Hillary?
3) On the Russian Sanctions: there were “no agreements whatsoever” to lift sanctions.
I believe the sanctions are in place and welching on that agreement would have had repercussions.
I don't see a man with his intelligence background trying to wing it with lies in a televised interview. He should know how to evade and avoid and tell partial truths but definite lies would be foolish.