Judicial Watch Releases Another 115 Clinton Email Exchanges Involving Confidential Information

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

cnsnews
By Annabel Scott | June 2, 2017 | 10:06 AM EDT

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/annabel-scott/judicial-watch-releases-another-115-clinton-email-exchanges-involving

[excerpt]

(CNSNews.com) – As Hillary Clinton counts the many reasons for her election loss, Judicial Watch continues to seek documents related to her tenure as secretary of state, releasing another 2,078 pages on Thursday.

Those 2,078 documents include 115 Clinton email exchanges not previously turned over to the State Department.

Judicial Watch says the documents include more instances of Clinton sending and receiving classified/confidential information through an unsecured email server. They also show that Clinton’s daughter Chelsea and others involved with the Clinton Foundation received special favors from Huma Abedin, a top Clinton aide.

Judicial Watch says it obtained the documents after suing the State Department for its failure to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request filed in March 2015. The FOIA request sought “All emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-state.gov email address.”

Judicial Watch notes that the 115 Clinton email exchanges were not among the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton previously handed over to the State Department, contradicting her claim that she had turned over all of her government emails.

[sneakypete]

C'mon! She's a feeble old lady!

Give her a break!

After all,this is old news.

Can't we just move on?

 

[Oceander]

Unfortunately this is not going to go very far. 

[austingirl]

Those emails were most likely created by a content farm in Macedonia, suburban women, or the DNC- heck, maybe by Russia/WikiLeaks.

[Smokin Joe]

From the first FBI file on a "leading Republican" back in Billy Jeff's days in the Oval Office, this woman has been deeply involved in gathering and brokering information, classified, restricted, even from her eyes, it does not seem to matter. If this country cannot stand up and prosecute her for these egregious breaches of security, we will continue to lose ground in the effort to gain and retain technical, military, and other advantages over our potential enemies. The gap will close, is closing, and the Chinese have a space program because of such breaches, with all that implies for payload delivery.
Imho, she should be thoroughly investigated, and if evidence found (it is already prima facie) of violations, those violations charged, and she should be tried and suffer such punishment as the law allows, up to and including being stripped of assets. When someone in a position as high as Secretary of State is convicted of abuses of that position and violating the National Public Trust inherent in taking such an office, the penalty should be harsh, indeed.

[sneakypete]

From the first FBI file on a "leading Republican" back in Billy Jeff's days in the Oval Office, this woman has been deeply involved in gathering and brokering information, classified, restricted, even from her eyes, it does not seem to matter. If this country cannot stand up and prosecute her for these egregious breaches of security, we will continue to lose ground in the effort to gain and retain technical, military, and other advantages over our potential enemies. The gap will close, is closing, and the Chinese have a space program because of such breaches, with all that implies for payload delivery.
Imho, she should be thoroughly investigated, and if evidence found (it is already prima facie) of violations, those violations charged, and she should be tried and suffer such punishment as the law allows, up to and including being stripped of assets. When someone in a position as high as Secretary of State is convicted of abuses of that position and violating the National Public Trust inherent in taking such an office, the penalty should be harsh, indeed.

@Smokin Joe

Agree with every word,and I would suggest that a sentence of death by hanging or firing squad,which is traditional in cases of treason,be considered.

NONE of it is going to happen,though. The Clinton Crime Family and the Bush Crime Family were joined at the hip when it came to treason with China,so there is no interest from either branch of the Ruling Party for an actual investigation and trial.

Some people are "too big" to be arrested. She proved that when she ordered the FBI to deliver classified "raw" background check files on prominent politicians that she never even had the authority to see,never mind possess,and then refused to charge or prosecute her when she refused to give them back when she and Bubba left the WH. If they weren't willing to arrest her then when everyone KNEW she had broken the law and she ADMITTED to being in illegal possession of the documents,they ain't going to arrest her,period.

[Smokin Joe]

@Smokin Joe

Agree with every word,and I would suggest that a sentence of death by hanging or firing squad,which is traditional in cases of treason,be considered.

NONE of it is going to happen,though. The Clinton Crime Family and the Bush Crime Family were joined at the hip when it came to treason with China,so there is no interest from either branch of the Ruling Party for an actual investigation and trial.

Some people are "too big" to be arrested. She proved that when she ordered the FBI to deliver classified "raw" background check files on prominent politicians that she never even had the authority to see,never mind possess,and then refused to charge or prosecute her when she refused to give them back when she and Bubba left the WH. If they weren't willing to arrest her then when everyone KNEW she had broken the law and she ADMITTED to being in illegal possession of the documents,they ain't going to arrest her,period.

Yep. Every one a Felony count, prima facie. Just as every e-mail on or through her server was a Felony, some more severe than others. And then there was mere possession of code-word classified information (over 100 counts). The list is long, the violations egregious, and every one of them is a felony.

There is a long list of people who have gone to prison for mishandling one file. I guess when the counts number in 5 figures or more, it's okay.

[Bigun]

Yep. Every one a Felony count, prima facie. Just as every e-mail on or through her server was a Felony, some more severe than others. And then there was mere possession of code-word classified information (over 100 counts). The list is long, the violations egregious, and every one of them is a felony.

There is a long list of people who have gone to prison for mishandling one file. I guess when the counts number in 5 figures or more, it's okay.

And you can largely thank one man for it all!

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,265706.msg1345464.html#msg1345464

[Smokin Joe]

And you can largely thank one man for it all!

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,265706.msg1345464.html#msg1345464

Janet Reno was a big part of their keester covering, too. Considering her track record for persecuting members of churches (in Florida, later at Waco), she was perfect for the job.

[Bigun]

Janet Reno was a big part of their keester covering, too. Considering her track record for persecuting members of churches (in Florida, later at Waco), she was perfect for the job.

OH yeah! Let's definitely not forget about her!

[sneakypete]

Yep. Every one a Felony count, prima facie. Just as every e-mail on or through her server was a Felony, some more severe than others. And then there was mere possession of code-word classified information (over 100 counts). The list is long, the violations egregious, and every one of them is a felony.

There is a long list of people who have gone to prison for mishandling one file. I guess when the counts number in 5 figures or more, it's okay.

@Smokin Joe

And there are alleged Conservatives here that are insisting Trump should be forced to testify over his son-in-laws visit to Russia.

The one thing there will never be a world-wide shortage of is fools.

[Smokin Joe]

@Smokin Joe

And there are alleged Conservatives here that are insisting Trump should be forced to testify over his son-in-laws visit to Russia.

The one thing there will never be a world-wide shortage of is fools.

@sneakypete That's because knowledge, no matter how much we think we have, is limited. Stupidity is boundless.