Maxine Waters: American Public ‘Getting Weary’ That Trump Not Impeached Yet

[rangerrebew]

Maxine Waters: American Public ‘Getting Weary’ That Trump Not Impeached Yet


by Pam Key28 May 20176,131

 

Sunday on MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said the public was “getting weary” that Democrats have not done enough to begin the process of impeaching President Donald Trump.

Partial transcript as follows:

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/05/28/maxine-waters-american-public-getting-weary-that-trump-not-impeached-yet/

[Suppressed]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB-OcexH1n0

[Wingnut]

I love her James Brown wig.

[Sanguine]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB-OcexH1n0

That's perfect.  Even looks a bit like her.  The crazed eyes.

[240B]

Red Right Videos
May 29, 2017


Maxine Waters believes that we, the people, are “getting weary” that Donald Trump has yet to be impeached, specially she thinks that we, the people, believe Democrats haven’t done enough to begin the process… boy she couldn’t be more wrong.


And seriously… she needs to get off this “impeachment” kick. He’s done nothing to actually warrant it.


(more and video at link)
http://redrightvideos.com/maxine-waters-thinks-public-weary-trump-not-yet-impeached/


Yet more insanity from the 'crazy Congresswoman of Cali'. This woman lives in her own little world somewhere in outer space.

[Frank Cannon]

Some people are weary that she keeps getting reelected in her nonsense Leftist district.

[Sanguine]

Maxine Waters Thinks

Now, that's funny!

[Wingnut]

If James Brown had hair Max would be wearing it.

[240B]

The weirdest part of the video is all of her arguments for impeachment. Of course, I realize that she is crazy and possibly retarded, so I do not expect her to understand what I am saying. But so many top lawyers in the country, as well as officials in the FBI/CIA, have all said that even IF everything Maxine is saying is true there is still no 'crime'. Nothing she has said, whether it is true or not, is criminal. So even if she finds some 'smoking gun' that proves her case, which is highly doubtful, she still has no cause for impeachment.


As I said, her mental condition prevents her from understanding this, but I would think that someone, or some group of people, in the Democrat Party would hold an intervention of some kind. They need to explain to her that she is making a fool out of herself and making a fool of her Party. And she is too STUPID to even know it.

[truth_seeker]

That photo is from PBS (Public Broadcasting) which needs deep cuts.

[libertybele]

I'm getting very weary of Maxine Waters.  Maxine Waters is an ass!


www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxdluNk-unc

[To-Whose-Benefit?]

Repeating myself from another thread here.

How about we just Expel HER instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress

Process leading to expulsion

Presently, the disciplinary process begins when a resolution to expel or censure a Member is referred to the appropriate committee. In the House, this is the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct (House Ethics Committee); in the Senate, this is the Select Committee on Ethics (Senate Ethics Committee).

The committee may then ask other Representatives or Senators to come forward with complaints about the Member under consideration or may initiate an investigation into the Member's actions. Sometimes Members may refer a resolution calling for an investigation into a particular Member or matter that may lead to the recommendation of expulsion or censure.

Rule XI (Procedures of committees and unfinished business) of the Rules of the House of Representatives state that the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct can investigate allegations that a Member violated "any law, rule, regulation, or other standard of conduct applicable to the conduct of such Member... in the performance of his duties or the discharge of his responsibilities". The Senate Select Committee on Ethics has the same jurisdiction. The committee may then report back to their whole chamber as to its findings and recommendations for further actions.

When an investigation is launched by either committee, an investigatory subcommittee will be formed. Once the investigatory subcommittee has collected evidence, talked to witnesses, and held an adjudicatory hearing it will vote on whether the Member is found to have committed the specific actions and then will vote on recommendations. If expulsion is the recommendation then the subcommittee's report will be referred to the full House of Representatives or Senate where Members may vote to accept, reject, or alter the report's recommendation. Voting to expel requires the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present and voting.[citation needed]