Not going to deny that - assuming the story is accurate, which can be problematic for lifesitenews - the order to remove the quote was not one that should have been given. A suggestion is more appropriate for that sort of issue. Were the officer in question in my chain of command, they'd be looked at very hard indeed for it during the court martial proceedings.
However, it was given, and, being given by someone with the right to issue orders to the Lance and not an illegal order in itself, should then have been obeyed at once. One of the sad truths, rarely acknowledged, is that the people who do the most to defend inalienable rights do so by voluntarily giving up many of them for the duration.