Postal Service, citing losses, seeks higher stamp prices

[corbe]

Postal Service, citing losses, seeks higher stamp prices

By HOPE YEN Associated Press
  May 10, 2017 Updated 23 min ago
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Postal Service is hoping it can soon raise stamp prices by a penny or more.

The postal service on Wednesday reported a quarterly loss of $562 million, despite growth in package delivery, due to continued erosion in the use of first-class mail as well as expensive mandates for its retiree health care obligations. It also attributed losses to a forced reduction in stamp prices last year.

The postal service is generally barred under federal law from raising prices more than the rate of inflation. But it is seeking greater regulatory leeway to increase prices, including a one-cent rate hike provided in a measure being considered by Congress.

The current cost of a first-class stamp is 49 cents.

"America deserves a financially stable postal service that can continue to play a vital role in our economy and society," said Postmaster General Megan J. Brennan. She said the postal service continues to aggressively cut costs.

The financial report shows what it described as "controllable" income of more than $12 million for the three months that ended on March 31. But when taking into account expenses to prefund retiree health care and other items considered beyond the management's control, it posted a loss.

Operating revenue came to $17.3 billion, a decrease of $474 million from the same time last year.

The postal service continued to notch double-digit growth in its package business, boosted by the strength of Amazon and other Internet retailers. But that wasn't enough to offset losses in both first-class mail and marketing mail, also known as "junk mail," which make up the bulk of revenue.

<..snip..>

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/government/ap/postal-service-citing-losses-seeks-higher-stamp-prices/article_948cd9dd-b709-52c4-8174-ca0da9f52c9e.html

[geronl]

I guess the Post Office doesn't believe in negative return

[geronl]

vital role in the economy....

losing $2 billion is vital?