Author Topic: A potential fight is brewing in TV land over an under-20-dollar TV bundle without sports  (Read 538 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SZonian

  • Strike without warning
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,712
  • 415th Nightstalker
Last week,  news broke that several cable networks were trying to put together a sports-free online TV package for less than $20 a month.

The thinking goes like this: Sports rights are incredibly expensive, and tons of people are paying for sports they don’t watch in their cable bundle. In 2016, ESPN alone  cost $6.10 in carriage fees per subscriber. 

So why not have an option where you can chop off sports and pay a cheap rate for a good entertainment-only bundle. Makes sense, right?

Not exactly.

The main problem is that the parent companies of the major broadcast networks — NBC, ABC, CBS, and Fox — have paid a lot for sports rights, so they want no part of a bundle that makes sports seem less vital. The cable networks they own are also out. Bye-bye FX.

[excerpted]
http://www.businessinsider.com/sports-free-cable-tv-bundles-2017-4

Quote
Been wanting to cut the cord for some time now, getting closer due to pricing and selection.  Wife is almost convinced to cut, but if not, a la carte is the way to go...sick of paying for hundreds of garbage channels that are blocked from the tuner.
Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.