Going to take exception to this:
Overriding everything, though, is this. A President’s advisor putting the President in the position of being forced to choose between that advisor and the President’s own son-in-law is not a good advisor. The Presidency is a difficult job and the President, at the end of the day, can only be assured of the love and loyalty of his family.
If the Presidents son in law (or son, or daughter) is a terrible advisor, an advisor has the duty to get between them and point this out.
Erickson putting me in the position of even tangentially defending that scumbag Bannon makes me need a shower.