Author Topic: James Madison: President Can Use Force Without Authorization Only 'to Repel Sudden Attacks'  (Read 373 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Article from when Obama bombed Libya and Syria.

Quote
Can the president unilaterally initiate the use of military force without a prior authorization from Congress? In his notes from the Constitutional Convention, James Madison stated that the Executive could only do so when it was necessary "to repel sudden attacks."

The White House is now contending that President Obama can engage in an extended military campaign against ISIS in Iraq and Syria without prior congressional authorization. Who is right: The Obama White House or James Madison?

The Constitutional Convention dealt with this issue on Aug. 17, 1787. Here are James Madison notes on the debate in the convention that day that resulted in the power being held by Congress....

http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/james-madison/james-madison-president-can-use-force-without-authorization-only-repel



Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Rubio made the point that having those chemical weapons constituted a thread to our troops in the region.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Rubio made the point that having those chemical weapons constituted a thread to our troops in the region.


Rubio was one of those demanding Obama go to Congress when he struck ISIS. 

http://billingsgazette.com/news/national/potential-candidates-fault-obama-war-powers-plan/article_83d77dca-38a5-527e-9c4a-2b4b01510e08.html