Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant’

[rangerrebew]

Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant’
 

by Ben Kew31 Mar 20175403



Democrats in Montana have opposed a bill banning the use of foreign law in its state courts on the grounds that such legislation would target Muslims.

Senate Bill 97, introduced by Keith Regier (R-Kalispell) bans the application of foreign law in Montana’s courts, with the debate particularly focused on Sharia Law, a form of Islamic law typically used in the Middle East.

Although the bill passed on party lines by 56-44, Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/31/montana-democrats-vote-against-bill-banning-sharia-law-call-it-repugnant/

[EC]

There are democrats in Montana?

Who knew? 

[endicom]

Senate Bill 97, introduced by Keith Regier (R-Kalispell) bans the application of foreign law in Montana’s courts, with the debate particularly focused on Sharia Law, a form of Islamic law typically used in the Middle East.

I believe there is more than twice as many days in the year as there are foreign nations so we can easily allocate one day each year to each foreign law.

[Cripplecreek]

The constitution already bans other forms of law in America.

[Free Vulcan]

I would retort that the Dems give Muslim's religious preference that violates their precious separation of church and state.

[Fishrrman]

"Although the bill passed on party lines by 56-44, Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities."

I most certainly hope that that is exactly what it does.

And it's obvious why the democrats oppose it.

They are increasingly becoming "the party of advancing islam"...