Are facts now considered 'white supremacism'?

[rangerrebew]

 Are facts now considered 'white supremacism'?
Posted By Mychal Massie On 03/27/2017 @ 7:36 pm In APP Frontpage,Commentary,Opinion | No Comments


I would like you to read the following quote and tell me what it is really saying and what it is advocating. Dr. Chris Emdin of Columbia University writes: “I want white teachers to teach in the hood, believe it or not. I’m for that. But I want them to do it in a way that makes them effective and not burnt out. Black teachers with white supremacist ideologies [are] just as dangerous as white folks who don’t understand culture.”

Your time is up. If you understood or guessed that Emdin is advocating for the continued dysfunctional and destructive behavior that has plagued blacks and specifically those in urban environs for generations, then you understood correctly.

Just what are the “white supremacist ideologies” associated with the presentation of factual American history, civics, mathematics, English, science, biology, chemistry, the study of Shakespearean literature, English literature, engineering, physics, personal finance, personal health and hygiene, etc.?


Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/are-facts-now-considered-white-supremacism/

[LMAO]

 The biggest threat to black people is not white supremacist or the Ku Klux Klan.

The biggest threat to them is well meaning  liberals with their good intentions

[Smokin Joe]

The biggest threat to black people is not white supremacist or the Ku Klux Klan.

The biggest threat to them is well meaning  liberals with their good intentions

Ken Hamblin used to offer a Certificate of Absolution of White Guilt on his radio show, saying if you want to do black people some good, quit helping (referring to do-gooder liberals).