Author Topic: Trump federal budget 2018: Massive cuts to the arts, science and the poor  (Read 620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
President Trump on Thursday will unveil a budget plan that calls for a sharp increase in military spending and stark cuts across much of the rest of the government including the elimination of dozens of long-standing federal programs that assist the poor, fund scientific research and aid America’s allies abroad.

Trump’s first budget proposal, which he named “America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again,” would increase defense spending by $54 billion and then offset that by stripping money from more than 18 other agencies. Some would be hit particularly hard, with reductions of more than 20 percent at the Agriculture, Labor and State departments and of more than 30 percent at the Environmental Protection Agency.

It would also propose eliminating future federal support for the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Within EPA alone, 50 programs and 3,200 positions would be eliminated.

The cuts could represent the widest swath of reductions in federal programs since the drawdown after World War II, probably leading to a sizable cutback in the federal non-military workforce, something White House officials said was one of their goals.

“You can’t drain the swamp and leave all the people in it,” White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney told reporters.

More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trump-federal-budget-2018-massive-cuts-to-the-arts-science-and-the-poor/2017/03/15/0a0a0094-09a1-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html

Seeing as it's WaPo, if someone finds a slightly less headsplody article, please add it.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline Weird Tolkienish Figure

  • Technical
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,295
Oh boy here we go. Mean ol' Republicans killing science, arts, & the poor. Can't these things survive on their own?

Offline Cripplecreek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,718
  • Gender: Male
  • Constitutional Extremist
The problem with these cuts is that too often they end up not being what they seem.

One of the first bills my congressman pushed when he went to DC was a 50% cut in the endowment for the arts.Unfortunately by the time it made it out of committee and to the floor for a vote it was a 20% cut in the amount of annual increase in endowment funding. the 20% that was "cut" was re-budgeted for something else.

Maybe its time for a new approach like limiting the amount of revenue the government can take in.

Offline kevindavis007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,487
  • Gender: Male
Oh boy here we go. Mean ol' Republicans killing science, arts, & the poor. Can't these things survive on their own?


Funny, there was art before the National Endowment for the arts.
Join The Reagan Caucus: https://reagancaucus.org/ and the Eisenhower Caucus: https://EisenhowerCaucus.org

Ronald Reagan: “Rather than...talking about putting up a fence, why don’t we work out some recognition of our mutual problems and make it possible for them to come here legally with a work permit…earning here they pay taxes here.”

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,475
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Maybe its time for a new approach like limiting the amount of revenue the government can take in.
This government already spends three dollars for every two it takes in. Do you think for a moment they won't keep on borrowing?
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024