Hospitals can not by law refuse care to anyone...even if they can't pay for it. That Good Samaritan stuff is taken care of already.
Not for free, they don't: others are forced to pay for it, one way or another. And how is the government not involved, if they passed a law requiring it? So that response actually works against your stated position.
When it comes to things like trying to control healthcare...force people to buy policies they don't want or need...abscond with 1/7 of the economy...you're damn right I mean never.
You're putting words in my mouth now. But that's an awful lot of qualifiers to justify that "never." Just to point out, you've already contradicted yourself: "Hospitals
can not by law refuse care to anyone." So "never" turns out not to be "never" after all.
And you're moving goal posts. Just like when you brought roads into a discussion about healthcare.
How so? You said "government." You didn't initially differentiate, until you did. If anybody's moving the goalposts, you are.
Apples and oranges.
You don't get to just say that, without explaining why. In what way is the government taxing you for roads, different from the government taxing you to provide money for health care?
Taxiation without representation...didn't we fight a war over something like that.
Congress passed the law.... They're not worth much, but they are elected representatives and as such, constitute "representation."
And thanks for highlighting my point about government interference...imagine how may people would benefit from NOT having the Federal government forcing states to add that extra 18.4 cents to every gallon of gas they put into their car.
So, what are you saying, exactly?