Oops: Washington Post Tried to Make a Case for More Spending, but Does the Opposite

[rangerrebew]

 Oops: Washington Post Tried to Make a Case for More Spending, but Does the Opposite
by Spencer Irvine on March 15, 2017
 

More private sector interaction in the economy, combined with state influence, can be a good thing regarding free market economics and governance. The Washington Post attempted to paint a negative picture of free market principles in a recent article about President Trump’s proposed budget cuts to the federal government.

Instead of making a case against the free market and for more government spending and regulations, the Washington Post made a compelling case for the free market and less regulations:

    Simply put, government would be smaller and less involved in regulating life in America, with private companies and states playing a much bigger role.

http://www.aim.org/on-target-blog/oops-washington-post-tried-to-make-a-case-for-more-spending-but-does-the-opposite/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AccuracyInMedia+%28Accuracy+In+Media%29