He didn't do himself any favors there. And it is he, not his critics, who misunderstand pedophilia.
Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas.
Certainly, imho, he's conflicted on some critical points.
Supposedly 'pedophilia' refers to sex with children before puberty. There's another word 'eu. . . ' I forget . . . about post puberty sex.
Personally, it's all hideous, abusive, seriously twisted, destructive, etc.
I think MOSTLY, Milo would agree with that.
Where he stuck something in the meat grinder was casting 13 year old boy sex with an older man in any sort of positive light at all.
Given his own abused background, I can understand his conflicted feelings. However, his style of speak provocatively, outrageously first and think later got him in trouble, and understandably so, imho.
All this against a background
where Shrillery, Billdo et al have evidently (according to a high ranking NYPD Commisioner who's seen the videos)
been awash in YOUNG CHILDREN being sexually abused . . . and THEY and evidently layers of our politicos, courts, police, academia etc. are getting a more or less totally free pass, so far.
It will be interesting to see what Milo says tomorrow at his news conference on the topic.
I hope he can recover and make things abundantly clear against pedophilia with any underage child/youth.
The idea that an isolated, lonely, 13 year old could provide legal, adult level 'informed consent' is totally absurd.