@TomSea Without your condescending personalization of your statement
;
"Personalization"? Who was I speaking to besides you? Never mind...
again, if one is denying others the right to marriage, that is not about them shoving their sexuality in others faces.
Sure it is. As far as I'm concerned, a man and a woman can marry. Including "others" is a redefinition of the entire concept but it isn't marriage.
The entire push for gay marriage has nothing to do with "equal rights"; rather it's a demand that their lifestyles be met with wholesale approval. Witness the related cases of bakery owners who won't bake their cakes being driven to ruin. They have zero tolerance for the slightest dissent or disapproval.
Have you personally known any gays? I have. I can attest to the truth of the article I'm linking below. They're notoriously promiscuous, even those who claim to be monogamous/married.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/06/26/most_gay_couples_aren_t_monogamous_will_straight_couples_go_monogamish.html
"And in legalizing gay marriage, we are accepting a form of sanctioned marriage that is not by habit monogamous and that is inventing all kinds of new models of how to accommodate lust and desire in long-term relationships."
It's naive to believe otherwise.
If this is not a debate forum but an acting self-righteous forum, then, we can leave the conversation there. These are simply questions asked on this topic.
So in other words, if we don't think like you about gays and gay marriage, we're self-righteous. Yeah, I see where you're coming from.
I think the States should deal with legal matters per same-sex marriage, does that answer your question?
Yes, you've answered that one and others, as well.