I guess you would take that approach if you didn't think a government with strings to Putin was not cause for alarm. I don't like Trumps secrets and I am sure that whatever was done to tap was legally done.
Do tell. Define "strings". Nations with common interests work together. There is nothing to be gained by getting into a p*ssing contest over who is the least moral state. The U.S. and Russia are not contemplating marriage, like businesses they are examining areas of mutual cooperative interest (such as destroying Salafist terrorist networks). Putin is a brutal pragmatist who does not respect weakness or dissembling. In geopolitics words are meaningless unless backed up by action.
DJT will likely do whatever he believes to be in the best interests of the USA, not of Russia, because he wants to be reelected. Believe whatever you want but to fail to realize that is IMO to drift into the realm of morbid fantasy.
An investigation into the leaks is equally if not more imperative than investigating Flynn. We know almost everything about what Flynn did or may have done already (since the conversation at central issue was apparently recorded) and not even the hack leftist acting AG (since fired for good reason) said that there was any evidence of a crime in Flynn's conduct.
So by all means, let the investigations begin.