Author Topic: Trump Challenges the Internationalist Order. What the hysterical response of the opposition tells us.  (Read 295 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Trump Challenges the Internationalist Order
What the hysterical response of the opposition tells us.
January 31, 2017
Bruce Thornton
19
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook70Share to TwitterShare to More78Share to Print

Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

A job begun is half done, as the Romans used to say. Restoring our nation’s pride in its exceptionalism, and keeping our government’s obligation to put our country’s interests and security first, is job number one for the new president. After just one week in office, President Trump has made a good start at dismantling the internationalist order that for nearly a century has tried to weaken and subordinate national sovereignty and identity to globalist institutions. The hysterical response of the global elites and this country’s fellow-travelers tells us Trump is drawing blood.

Trump’s executive orders and comments on securing our southern border, renegotiating NAFTA, and banning refugees from jihadist-infested countries––from a list drawn up during the Obama administration by the way–– drew the usual blustering dudgeon. Mexico’s complaints about Trump’s comments were laughably hypocritical. Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto said, “Mexico does not believe in walls.” Of course they don’t believe in their northern border because Mexico uses illegal immigration into the U.S. to get rid of people for whom they have no jobs or opportunities, and from whom they secure $25 billion a year in remittances, more than the revenues from the sale of oil.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265628/trump-challenges-internationalist-order-bruce-thornton
« Last Edit: January 31, 2017, 03:07:49 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
'Cui bono' runs through that article. Looking at who benefits from policy says much about its intent.