Why isn't Ft. Lauderdale massacre called terror?
Ex-top FBI expert: 'America was attacked
by an Islamic terrorist, the flags are there'
Published: 11 hours ago
Deadly mass shooting at Ft. Lauderdale airport on Jan. 6, 2017
WASHINGTON – Why hasn’t the deadly mass shooting at the Ft. Lauderdale airport been classified as an act of Islamic terrorism?
Review the known facts:
Shortly after a bloody attack on Jan. 6 that killed five people and wounded six, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said the shooter was carrying military ID with the name of Esteban Santiago.
The very next day, the website GotNews published evidence showing the same Esteban Santiago had registered on MySpace in 2007 under the name Aashiq Hammad.
He also posted a song identified as the Arabic recitation of the Muslim declaration of faith, “There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger,” generally considered sufficient to convert to Islam.
ABC News reported on Jan. 9, that the FBI had taken that revelation seriously, examining Santiago’s laptop “to determine whether the alleged shooter created a jihadist identity for himself using the name Aashiq Hammad.”
An Internet search showed ABC’s one report on the shooter’s jihadi identity appears to be the only mainstream media mention of Aashiq Hammad. Or his possible jihadi identity.
With that one exception, the speculation in the media has focused entirely on whether the shooter was mentally unstable, not whether he was a jihadi, after it was learned the 26-year-old New Jersey-born Iraq veteran told the FBI in November that the CIA was forcing him to join ISIS and that he was hearing voices.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/why-isnt-ft-lauderdale-massacre-called-terror/#HU5OQtbb35SZufxy.99
