I don't see how it could be otherwise. If I thought someone were more moral than i was...I'd emulate him.
If I didn't think so, I'd keep on being as I was and am.
It's like taste in clothes. Unless a person is dressing for someone else - spouse, office dress-code, military uniform - barring those, we dress the best we know how, by our own tastes. WE think we're dressing the best. OTHER people make fashion blunders; not us.
Because if we thought they were blunders, we'd stop.
(while I put on my plaid pants, to go with my striped shirt...)
As for morality, I agree. I recognize those on par, morally, although I have a tendency to give people more credit than they deserve sometimes, and I have met some I consider to be morally superior in that their ways of dealing with the immoral are somewhat unfettered by social conventions or more constrained than my own. Either has its moments, and I have on occasion admired the way people have dealt with situations I might not have dealt with quite the same way.
As for clothing, not me. I don't much worry about fashion. I'm a fan of comfortable, durable clothes. Practical garments with a decent lifespan, and something you could get by with if stranded in the sticks. Blue jeans, boots, wool socks, and heavy twill shirts are standard with me. If I wear slacks and a 'dress shirt', I feel like I'm wearing pajamas. I wore a necktie for my last two years of High School, and I haven't had much use for one since. To me, they are just something to keep the soup and gravy off your buttons, an evolutionary branch of the bib, and something that has far too much potential to get tangled up in some piece of equipment and cause harm.
Now, I don't consider that 'superior' to anyone else, and have little doubt others won't see the NFPA 2112 tags on the Flame Resistant clothing and recognize it usually costs more than the dress shirt or the slacks they have on, but I don't really care. The bottom line is that I am comfortable, and for me, the clothing is practical, too.