Southern Poverty Law Center Covers Up Anti-White Hate Crime By Elliot Friedland

[TomSea]

Southern Poverty Law Center Covers Up Anti-White Hate Crime
The SPLC branded counter-Islamist orgs. like Clarion Project as hate groups while covering up genuine hatred to support their political agenda.
By Elliot Friedland
Tue, December 6, 2016

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been caught red-handed covering up evidence of anti-white hate being peddled in American schools, as reported in a searing expose by journalist Paul Sperry for the New York Post. The group, which styles itself an anti-hate group, recently released a report entitled “The Trump Effect: The Impact of the 2016 Presidential Election on Our Nation’s Schools” which collated the findings of a survey of some 10,000 educators of K-12 across the country.

The report concluded that “the results of the election are having a profoundly negative impact on schools and students” adding “ninety percent of educators report that school climate has been negatively affected, and most of them believe it will have a long-lasting impact.”

However, the SPLC was only interested in data which indicated bigotry in one direction. They found out of the 10,000 teachers surveyed, “Four in 10 have heard derogatory language directed at students of color, Muslims, immigrants and people based on gender or sexual orientation.”

Yet despite asking whether or not respondents “have heard derogatory language or slurs about white students,” SPLC did not include the answers in their report. Paul Sperry requested the information from SPLC and spokesperson Kirsten Bokenkamp eventually told him “about 20 percent answered affirmatively to that question.”

That adds up to some 2,000 instances of bias against white students which were deliberately erased from the report.

This omission is galling because of how SPLC frames itself. It is not a partisan organization lobbying for the Democratic Party. Nor is it an organization that exclusively champions Muslims and other minority groups. It is set up to fight hate, at least ostensibly from any quarter.

Continued: https://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/southern-poverty-law-center-covers-anti-white-hate-crime

   

[HonestJohn]

This is agit-prop.

The report referenced was a preliminary "first-look" at the results.  It specifically states that they had not yet completed reviewing all 25,000 results.

And yet, after it was published, Elliot then called (a week after the preliminary report was released) asking for how many responses were against whites.  As they were continuing to analyze the results, they actually had the numbers by that point and provided them.

Elliot then uses that to then, ex post facto, d@#n them for not providing information in the preliminary report that that didn't have at the time.

[truth_seeker]

Good for a great big belly laugh, when a supposed "conservative" member, supports the SPLC--in ANY manner, whatsoever.

Conservative, my ass. Try taking liberal side of almost every issue. We have had and continue to have a few of those.

[TomSea]

From what I read in the article,

4 out of 10 teachers have heard remarks against homosexuals, blacks and Latinos, so that is 40% of the teachers.

2 out of 10 teachers have heard remarks against whites.

But if one then breaks down the "4 out of 10 teachers" into likewise groups, "against homosexuals", "against blacks" and "against Latinos" (maybe against Asians and other minorities were included in the original data),

Then it seems that remarks against whites is likely on par with these other groups.

It seems a flakey way to analyze though to begin, "hearing remarks against Hispanics" for example, what does that mean? Etc.

[HonestJohn]

Good for a great big belly laugh, when a supposed "conservative" member, supports the SPLC--in ANY manner, whatsoever.

Conservative, my ass. Try taking liberal side of almost every issue. We have had and continue to have a few of those.

Do you ever post anything but personal insults?

Troll.

[Sanguine]

Good for a great big belly laugh, when a supposed "conservative" member, supports the SPLC--in ANY manner, whatsoever.

Conservative, my ass. Try taking liberal side of almost every issue. We have had and continue to have a few of those.

@truth_seeker, how is posting this article supporting SPLC?  The article does the opposite. Did you read it?

[Mod1]

Good for a great big belly laugh, when a supposed "conservative" member, supports the SPLC--in ANY manner, whatsoever.

Conservative, my ass. Try taking liberal side of almost every issue. We have had and continue to have a few of those.

@HonestJohn is in no way defending the SPLC in his post.  He merely pointed out some inaccuracies in the article.

His post in no way warranted the uncalled for personal attack you launched into.

Knock it off accusing everyone you don't see eye to eye with of being a Liberal.  Quit the scare quotes around "Conservative".