Author Topic: EPA plans to withdraw pollution regulations for seven Texas power plants  (Read 515 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
EPA plans to withdraw pollution regulations for seven Texas power plants
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2016/11/29/epa-withdraws-pollution-regulations-for-seven-texas-power-plants/
November 29, 2016

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it plans to voluntarily withdraw a requirement that seven Texas coal-fired power plants reduce pollution, according to a filing with a federal appeals court.

The so-called regional haze rule is part of the Clean Air Act and was proposed two years ago with the goal of cleaning up the air in national parks. The act requires states to craft a plan to address air pollution, or else be forced to implement a plan compiled by the EPA. Texas declined to create a plan, and along with power plant owners took its objections to the EPA’s plan to court.

The EPA said it plans to soon file a motion to withdraw the regional haze rule with U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is reviewing it. The agency is not expected to scrap the rule, but  rather to reevaluate its requirements  come back with a reworked  rule, according to the Sierra Club, a national environmental advocacy group. The original rule targeted sulfur dioxide pollution in national parks, and required that coal-fire power plants use scrubbers, air pollution control devices, to reduce emissions.

The rule would apply to seven power plants that the EPA claims affect air quality in Big Bend National Park and the Guadalupe Mountains National Park, the only two national parks in Texas. Big Bend is along the state’s western border with Mexico and the Guadalupe Mountains run along the Texas-New Mexico border.

Texas-based electric utility Luminant owns four of the power plants, Big Brown, Monticello, Martin Lake and Sandow, which are in north or east Texas. The other power plants are in southern and central Texas, including Coleto Creek, soon to be owned by the Houston-based energy company Dynegy, and Limestone, owned by NRG Energy. One West Texas power plant was also on the list, Tolk, owned by Xcel Energy.

Luminant and NRG declined comment. The other companies could not be immediately reached.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline SZonian

  • Strike without warning
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,722
  • 415th Nightstalker
Re: EPA plans to withdraw pollution regulations for seven Texas power plants
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2016, 07:21:24 pm »
Wait, the prevailing winds are typically Southerly or Westerly...

How, exactly, does "pollution" from coal plants in NORTHERN, SOUTHERN, CENTRAL and EASTERN Texas end up WEST of the plants?
Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,750
Re: EPA plans to withdraw pollution regulations for seven Texas power plants
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2016, 01:56:50 pm »
Maybe the EPA should summarily get Mexico to stop polluting so the Big Bend Park has nice air.

Bet it would do a lot more good than having asked power plants 600 miles away to stop polluting.

I believe what we are seeing with this EPA pullback is efforts to make them justify their requirements.

Refreshing, but there is a long way to go.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington