0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Michigan has already recounted their vote,
Jill Stein didn't even come close to winning in any state, so I'm still trying to figure out what right she actually has to demand a recount??
Because she has the money (garnered from donations) and it will boost her party's name value with liberals. Which is a net benefit for her party come the next election.
Name recognition as a loser who received donations to try to overturn the election to another loser. Got it.
Well, recounts do always seem to favor the Democrat... but if the Dems actually do try to recount their way to victory, there will likely be a LOT of outrage and questions about the election's legitimacy.
I've questioned the legitimacy of this election since somehow Hillary started out the gate with super delegates and Bernie had none.
You have to give Hillary credit for working for years on groundwork to have those super delegates go her way. She was put getting local support while Bernie and others didn't do a think at the local level.
The original vote gets certified tomorrow, then they will consider the recount request by Jill Stein.
Do that in one state and the election goes to the House.